" Bad Character Evidence" Part Two.......
The below quotes come from the papers at the time of the trial.....
his conduct after Yeates died when he hid the body was “frankly disgusting” and had caused untold anguish and agony to her family.
Covered this one..
: “I’m not going to ask you to like Vincent Tabak. There’s probably nothing to like.”
The Defence push the boundaries of decency here... They cast aspersions on Dr Vincent Tabak's over all Character, without any "Evidence" provided by the "DEFENCE" themselves to prove the contrary
And Miss Morson seems to agree, having failed to make a single appearance at court.
By bringing into court that his longtime girlfriend had failed to appear at the trial, it suggest, that Dr Vincent tabak is such a dispicable person, they one and only person in this country who knew him well enough had, as it appeared "Failed him"... But infact.. Tanja Morson was kept away from the trial and sent away on holiday by her family...
He had told “lie after lie to the police.
This that Defence are refering too, is the infamous CJ interview where he talks about CJ's car.....
did everything he could to cover his tracks”.
That again is an UNTRUE..... If Dr Vincent Tabak did everyting in his power to cover his tracks he would have disposed of his "Laptop" in a River in Holland"...
But the Jury are being influenced by the Defence as to The "Bad Character" of their OWN Client...
He added that he would not try to justify Tabak’s actions after her death, saying his client was “living a lie” by attending dinner parties and attempting to carry on his life as normal.
Another example from the Defence as to Dr Vincent Tabak's carefree nature and uncaring approach...
“I’m not going to ask you to have any sympathy for him. He deserves none.
WOW... This one is EXTREMELY harsh.... The Defence had completely dropped there client in the fire.... "Nothing to like".... That statement in itself should be enough for the Jury to think that this man is Guilty of everything... Everything from this trial to anything your imagination can come up with...
He makes this HUGE "Statement "... Yet "No"... "Good Character Evidence".. was brought to court in Defence of Dr Vincent Tabak... and The "Good Character Evidence should be brought to trial by The Defence...
If it is the Defence who are actually bringing
The Bad Character Evidence to trial about their own Client.... Is that not an abuse of power.... Is that "Not an abuse of the
Principles of Law??...
“I’m not going to ask you to excuse his conduct. There can be no excuse.
“If I was to set out to win a popularity contest I would lose.
He told the court: “Of course, afterwards his behaviour is utterly disgraceful. It’s not going to be justified by me
but it does not help in thinking of what happened at the flat….
This Particular quote is quite worring.. not saying the others aren't , But this quote allows The Jury to conjour in their minds what they may think occured to Joanna Yeates , and what perverse things he may have done after being alone with her dead body...
There is absolutley NO Evidence as to What happened to Joanna Yeates apart from what Dr Vincent Tabak said on the witness stand...
Ever time the Defence utter words of distain for their client, it was another underhanded attempt to cast doubt on Dr Vincent Tabak "Good Character"... There was nothing in Dr Vincent Tabak's history to suggest that he was a man of "Bad Character"... The CPS could find nothing to support a claim of any Offence that Dr Vincent Tabak had previously...