I find this statement strange. Heri states on his blog that Maddie was abducted by a stranger...he states it as a fact...yet you claim he has not ruled out the Mccanns ...that does not add up.
The fact that you describe one of the leading sceptics on the forum as one of the most open minded is also strange. Please note that myself and other supporters are very open minded and would be happy to consider any new evidence that implicates the McCanns...there just isn't any...and Heri seems to agree with us
It depends on your definition of 'sceptic' I suppose. I didn't give myself that label, so I can't comment on what you think it means.
My position is that I don't know what happened to Madeleine McCann, and I haven't seen any theory which explains it to my satisfaction.
That, in my opinion, allows me to be more open minded than someone who has committed themselves to defending a particular theory.
They, in my opinion, are more likely to accept evidence which supports their theory than to accept evidence which casts doubt on it. That isn't being open minded.