I am discussing the facts. The fact is that there was clearly insufficient grounds to make DP an offical suspect in this case, a fact you do not wish to acknowledge for some reason.
A fact so obvious that I'm surprised you feel the need to point it out. To recap, the facts are;
Two separate witnesses reported being uneasy about DP. One of them was also unsure about the McCanns and the other one suggested Gerry might have been cmplicit.
Gerry McCann made a couple of comments about DP in his 10th May statement. He suggested that DP checked the McCann children on the evening of the 2nd May and that he left the tennis courts at 6:30 on 3rd to visit Kate, returning at 7 pm.
No-one else thought that DP checked the McCann children, I wonder why Gerry thought he might have? As far as the half hour visit by DP to 5A on 3rd, Gerry changes that in his arguido statement. He now says DP returned a few minutes after leaving, then went off again until 7 pm. That isn't confirmed by DP or anyone else either. With friends like Gerry you don't need enemies imo.