"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Cruel and callous Corinne Mitchell stated on the 29th April 2010

“one last point about the "Parka"
The police are well aware we never burned the thing..............THEY HAVE IT!!!!!!!!

“the police tried saying that the parka that was bought AFTER the murder was a replacement for the one I was supposed to have burned. How can we replace something we never had in the first place.
people who have stated they saw Luke in a parka often......did indeed.......he wore it constantly after it was purchased and was constantly in the press wearing it. ofcourse some people are going to get confused as to when theey saw him wearing it...remember, at the time, the press were relentless and Luke was hounded on a daily basis!

And on the 3rd of May 2010 Corinne stated;

“Luke was hounded by the Press and photographed every day.....wearing the parka. Thats the picture of him that people carry in their heads and that is how some said they THOUGHT he had a parka”


In reality Corinne had no idea what picture people carried in their heads

And in reality LM was not photographed every day - wearing the parka !

[Nicholas]

Part 20 - The Fraud Of The Criminal Cases Review Commission
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/11/10/the-fraud-of-the-criminal-cases-review-commission-ccrc-part-20%ef%b8%8f/

[Nicholas]

Cruel and callous Corinne Mitchell stated on the 29th April 2010

“one last point about the "Parka"
The police are well aware we never burned the thing..............THEY HAVE IT!!!!!!!!

“the police tried saying that the parka that was bought AFTER the murder was a replacement for the one I was supposed to have burned. How can we replace something we never had in the first place.
people who have stated they saw Luke in a parka often......did indeed.......he wore it constantly after it was purchased and was constantly in the press wearing it. ofcourse some people are going to get confused as to when theey saw him wearing it...remember, at the time, the press were relentless and Luke was hounded on a daily basis!

And on the 3rd of May 2010 Corinne stated;

“Luke was hounded by the Press and photographed every day.....wearing the parka. Thats the picture of him that people carry in their heads and that is how some said they THOUGHT he had a parka”


In reality Corinne had no idea what picture people carried in their heads

And in reality LM was not photographed every day - wearing the parka !

Sandra Lean August 15, 2012
However, there are a couple of things I can clarify from what I have read today. Firstly, the photograph of Luke which has been posted here was taken on August 14th 2003 (six weeks after the murder) in Dalkeith Police Station at 8am. It was placed in a spread of 11 other pictures that morning, and all 12 were taken to AB that day for her to "identify" Luke. Those events have been severely criticised by Roy Ramm and John Scott, John Scott commenting that they didn't have an arrow pointing to Luke Mitchell, but they might as well have done, because Luke's picture stood out so much. Having seen the other 11 pictures, I agree completely - the others were of much younger children, the hair- styles, although all similar to each other (close cropped), were very different to Luke's. All of the other backgrounds were "rooms" of some description, Luke's was a polaroid style with a white band across the top, and very little background detail.

This photograph was not, as has been claimed, taken when Luke was arrested in April 2004 - the "identification" by AB from that photograph was made on August 14th, six weeks after the murder, and the day before pictures of Luke began to appear in newspapers.. However, the picture of Luke did not match the descriptions AB gave to the police in her first two statements in July 2003, right after the murder. she was describing someone completely different - late teens, early twenties, brown, thick, messy hair, some of it sticking up at the back, wearing "fishing gear" with the same colour jacket and trousers. She said in both of those early statements that she would only recognise him again by his clothing and hair as she had not seen his face.
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg114365.html#msg114365


Killer Luke Mitchell wasn’t photographed by the media wearimg his replacement khaki Parka jacket until after the 14th August 2003

[Nicholas]

Why didn’t older brother Shane or Corinne Mitchell go out searching in this “dark, secluded path” with him?


Sandra Lean
Luke was 14 years old, he was on a dark, secluded path, his girlfriend was missing, he had told her mum he would check the path and, if he didn't meet Jodi en route, he would make his way to the mother's house. He said at the time, he just wanted to get up the path as quickly as possible - 14 year old boys generally don't willingly admit to being scared, but he said Mia the dog waas very excitable on the way up the path, and he just pulled her in, to keep her moving forward.
On the way back down, in the safety of numbers, he put her into "tracking mode" which he had not done on the way up, so he was actively looking for an "alert" or signal from her - on the way up, he had only been checking the path - on the way back down, he knew Jodi was not on the path, but if she had been in the field or the woods, the dog may have scented her. At 14, alone in the darkness, he was unlikely to go checking in the woods or the fields on his own - the arrangement had been clear - check the path, then up to the mother's house if he didn't meet up with Jodi. it was a catch 22 situation for Lue - he knew Jodi's mother was waiting for him to come up the path - if he'd gone off searching about in woods and fields, her mother would have been frantic that he was taking so long. Anyway, he has said many times since that he wasn't looking anywhere but the path, because he was afraid - if anything bad had happened to Jodi, he didn't want to be on his own. https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg115611.html#msg115611

And why, if he was afraid, did he choose to climb over that wall,and show no emotion after he did?

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean
Apologies to all concerned.

None of the pseudo-psychologists, whose opinions of Luke appeared in the media, ever actually spoke to him.

The original claim about an "unusual" relationship came from the liaison officer (referred to in court as the "Vixen in the henhouse") - she was totally and completely aware that Luke was sleeping on a settee in the living room, because the medication he had been given for trauma made him dopey, sleepy, and potentially a danger to himself going up and down stairs.

Corinne slept on a sofa at the other side of the room, ready to direct him back to his sofa if he started wandering in the night.

The liaison officer, who knew about this arrangement, wrote in her report "We found the suspect and his mother sleeping in the same room"

That's it - unusual relationship explained. Sorry for my lack of restraint earlier. https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg388031.html#msg388031

Corinne Mitchell was/is an adoptee

What impact did her ‘issues’ related to her adoption have on her sons

And what about Corinne and killer Luke Mitchell’s enmeshed relationship

[Nicholas]

notsure (21st March 2017)
What we need is a tv programme like the avery one.get people talking about it

Sandra Lean
Working on it , nottsure. It could never be as compelling as Making a Murderer, because there's so much that couldn't be broadcast under Scots Law, but that doesn't make it impossible. https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg390748.html#msg390748

[Nicholas]

I don’t rate Elizabeth Yardley https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg419297.html#msg419297

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean (26th October 2018)
Today, my book about the case, Innocents Betrayed, was launched. Profits from the book are being donated to help fund a new organisation, Long Road to Justice, which will be taking a radically new approach to helping the fight against injustice.

Details of the book can be found here:

www.longroadtojustice.com
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg448049.html#msg448049

 

[Nicholas]

Cruel and callous Corinne Mitchell stated on the 29th April 2010

“one last point about the "Parka"
The police are well aware we never burned the thing..............THEY HAVE IT!!!!!!!!

“the police tried saying that the parka that was bought AFTER the murder was a replacement for the one I was supposed to have burned. How can we replace something we never had in the first place.
people who have stated they saw Luke in a parka often......did indeed.......he wore it constantly after it was purchased and was constantly in the press wearing it. ofcourse some people are going to get confused as to when theey saw him wearing it...remember, at the time, the press were relentless and Luke was hounded on a daily basis!

And on the 3rd of May 2010 Corinne stated;

“Luke was hounded by the Press and photographed every day.....wearing the parka. Thats the picture of him that people carry in their heads and that is how some said they THOUGHT he had a parka”

Adoptee Corinne Mitchell and her gaslighting

[Nicholas]

Michelle Celestial-Easterly Moore
This was complete BS. I read up on it to see what the truth was. It was rubbish.

Same Michelle Moore
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/23/killer-luke-mitchell-pro-knox-woman-michelle-moore-moderator-for-cult-like-sadistic-psychopath-killers-facebook-group-part-82/

[Nicholas]

www.longroadtojustice.com

 

 

[Nicholas]

Part 120
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/11/12/killer-luke-mitchell-innocence-fraud-pusher-hoaxer-sandra-lean-part-120/

[Nicholas]

Parky41
 "SK was only alibied by his girlfriend JaJ."
The truth, the fact is, SK was in the company of both his girlfriend and father.

Sandra Lean
Until 2014, that claim was not made known to the defence. Why not?
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg462082.html#msg462082

 

Hoaxer and liar Sandra Lean didn’t hear all the evidence heard at trial

[Nicholas]

Parky41
 "SK was only alibied by his girlfriend JaJ."
The truth, the fact is, SK was in the company of both his girlfriend and father.

Sandra Lean
Until 2014, that claim was not made known to the defence. Why not?
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg462082.html#msg462082

 

Hoaxer and liar Sandra Lean didn’t hear all the evidence heard at trial

Hoaxer and malignant narcissist Sandra Lean made claim in her discredited book No Smoke - liar and fraudster Lynne Hall went into Joan Albert’s home with a police officer before forensics had been completed.

This is just one example of the lies and disinformation

 

*Misinformation can spread when journalists misinterpret or fail to independently verify a source's claims. Information that is deliberately false or misleading. Disinformation is lying. It is the deliberate use of misinformation.

[Nicholas]

Hoaxer and malignant narcissist Sandra Lean made claim in her discredited book No Smoke - liar and fraudster Lynne Hall went into Joan Albert’s home with a police officer before forensics had been completed.

This is just one example of the lies and disinformation

 

*Misinformation can spread when journalists misinterpret or fail to independently verify a source's claims. Information that is deliberately false or misleading. Disinformation is lying. It is the deliberate use of misinformation.

Excerpts from No Smoke (chapter 5) by innocence fraud pusher & hoaxer Sandra Lean

Identification and Witnesses
There were no witnesses placing Simon Hall at or near the scene. Several witnesses claimed to have heard loud “crashing” noises at approximately 2am, although the prosecution would later claim that Mrs Albert was murdered at around 6am.

Simon’s car had been developing some problems - a noisy exhaust and trouble with headlights


Lynne Hall was a witness to her adoptive son Simon being ‘near the scene’ - she saw him minutes after he had committed his brutal and murderous crime.

And just like Corinne Mitchell, Lynne Hall went out of her way to provide the police with possible ‘credible suspects’ for her adoptive sons murder, very early on in their investigation.

”When Corinne received information about a credible suspect very early in the case, she called Judith to alert her. The call went to the answering machine. Judith called the police, who came and set up recording equipment on her phone..” ~ Sandra Lean https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg391168.html#msg391168

Liar and fraudster Lynne Hall referred to an alleged ‘incident’ from the week before her adoptive sons murder, attempting to implicate other innocent people http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/08/quite-a-hall-tale-part-7%ef%b8%8f/

Hoaxer and innocence fraud pusher Sandra Lean failed to mention the names of any of these alleged witnesses who she claimed “to have heard loud “crashing” noises at approximately 2am” nor did Sandra state where in proximity they lived to Joan Albert’s home. And whether or not it was possible they could have heard a window being broken at 6am from where they lived.

Sandra Lean also didn’t consider the fact ‘busy body’ and liar Lynne Hall began to divert attention away from her killer adoptive son (not unlike liar and fraudster Corinne Mitchell) as soon as she heard her ‘friend’ had been murdered - deflecting and attempting to re-write history with anyone who would listen to her. And Lynne Hall spoke to a lot of people/potential witnesses before the police had spoken to them.

Killer Simon Hall picked up his new car on Saturday the 15th December. He drove it back from the garage where he picked it up and drove it a village outside of Ipswich, then into Ipswich and parked it.

He then drove back to his adoptive parents home several hours later (was there for around an hour) then drove back into Ipswich. He then drove back to Capel St Mary at 5.30am where he parked up and went on to commit his murder of Joan Albert.

Simon Hall didn’t notice ‘trouble with headlights’ until around Monday/Tuesday 17th/18th December 2001 at the earliest.