Aren’t you doing exactly what you accuse me of...using a poor child’s death scene to score points against not the police but obviously someone you clearly despise?
No matter who killed her, whether Luke, someone known to her or an opportunist killer Jodi, in death, deserved to be treated with far more dignity than she was. I have read of many murders where the body was discovered at night and I have never heard of a body laying uncovered for the length of time Jodi’s did, except where incompetence played a part.
I really can’t fathom anyone’s mentality who thinks leaving a young girl’s mutilated body uncovered for the time it was can be justified in any way. The lack of consideration shown to Jodi and her family by L&B’s police that night will leave a stain on their reputation that can never be erased.
Predictive and indicative response yet again - However, two things here. These comments around the handling of the crime scene by this non erecting of a tent is on the basis of preserving evidence. Introducing indignity into leaving this girl uncovered for hours are cheap shots towards the police. Nothing more. Used to make people gasp. Jodi was in a woodland, not in some public thoroughfare with eyes everywhere. She was not exposed to anyone. Other than her poor family and those few people who had to witness what LM had done to her. If we are talking loss of evidence - this is fine, but not bringing in dignity to score points.
And they are cheap shots - In one hand making Jodi the person she was to use against the police and in the other hand talking of "rolling the body". These are your words, and Ms Leans - using them in these false claims of undignified handling by the police - to disperse disgust upon them - the disgust is in the people using them. And utterly ironic. For this author and those who take on board what she says and repeats - by means of manipulation to paint this murder into something it was not. For her to sit back - say "make of that what you will" - Watch the discussion around it - and not to intervene, not to correct - when people are discussing rape and all else. For that is exactly what people are making of her information - and it is wrong. And if you defend it - then ?.
And this nonsense of spite and all else - more cheap tactics. Why? because one is not bowled over and in love with all Ms Lean does? I will repeat again, I make no bones over Ms Lean. - had some spats with her over on another forum, pushed a few buttons to get the answers I was seeking, worked a treat. I find what she has done/does completely false - and overtly ironic. Considering the person/people she is defending. She has told blatant lies, she has then tried to pass the buck onto others - namely JF of all people? - more irony. Blame the liar for her own lies? - When I picked her up on this, guess what? - she told me she had another source for her lies? As I had pointed out to her the irony of believing the very person she makes heaps of assumptions upon, due to lies? - think we call it 'worming' out of being caught. She swiftly removed those comments because she breached herself into troubled waters - by claiming it was in JF's statement. oops! Another lie?
Revolving doors - lies to cover up lies and more needed to keep on covering. -some of her followers, ironically use "truth" quotes - Is that why we have LM's statements being morphed to match others? - completely transformed.
They did not erect a tent. Neither you nor anyone else know the correct context and circumstances around this. We all know and expect this basic protocol - But we do not know the ins and outs of this particular case, reasons a s to why. - What we do know is the repetitive assumption from that missing 99% in this area.
