Scott Forbes
3 hours ago (edited)
@Michele Scott the skunting knife that's reported as the 'missing knife' isn't missing, police swabbed it, didn't log the production but the swabs are preserved. Same with the Essay that didn't exists, more lies and corruption. The essay and its edited vetsion are in the productions!! More news coming soon
Scott Forbes
3 hours ago
@Michele Scott the Sun highlighted the story Re missing knife to 👏👏
Scott Forbes
1 hour ago
@CryingLightning19 what a contribution to such a serious case. You must be proud of yourself 👍
Scott Forbes
1 hour ago (edited)
@dodiblack since I published my book, I could write another one of what's come to light. The Essay I said MK wrote murder of a women in the woods, that they claimed they didn't find was named 'No Remorse', about a junkie (MK) killing/robbing a women in the woods. Tutor was that impressed that she asked for a follow up. So two essays in an envelope in productions (labeled) but they tell crown No essays....rotten to the core
UPDATED Part 130
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/11/21/killer-luke-mitchell-latest-on-tom-halliday-mr-big-ron-m/
I honestly do not believe at points Mr Forbes actually understands what he is saying. The appeal around MK and the essay - There 'labelled' in productions. The legal team and the time of the appeal, the same 'labelled productions' and he is applying these as the ones he was on about, about 'killing' a girl in the woods. Such a disturbing essay that i) The tutor asked for a follow up, ii) A follow up produced. and iii) He was clearly investigated much more than these people stated he was not.
So NOT hidden, there "labelled" in these productions, that the appeal team had access to - "Rotton to the core --------" The most disturbing aspect of this is Mr Forbes actually believes they have found something, and one does wonder if this is the "Stunning new evidence" they feel they have - Shakes one's head.
So, and again Mr Forbes, not "hidden" or of course buried anywhere, and one would place a small bet on these essays being embellished in your usual fashion. In plain sight for all to see Mr Forbes, the Crown, any legal team Mitchell has had Mr Forbes - Do attempt to be intellectual at least. So, in there will of course be the difference of night and day no doubt. What you claimed they consisted of and the reality of what they actually were. Such as that imaginary massive gouge upon his face that had disappeared by the time of him arriving at the police station Mr Forbes, nor of course any gouge at all on his face on the CCTV footage.
So, it cancels out completely the claims that MK was NOT investigated which really was something to do with the appeal being put in, was it not Mr Forbes, your claims of the police doing nothing. That MK was not out his head on a cocktail of drink and drugs at 10pm in the evening Mr Forbes when running into Dalkeith to buy his booze before close of day. That there is absolutely nothing that placed MK on Newbattle road. Nor the absolute fact that both the sightings were of one and the same male seen on either side of that path Mr Forbes.
Like the knife in the skip fiasco - Investigated and tested at the time, did NOT have anything of the victim upon it. Would NOT be any part of the actual trial and case for this reason as such.
But and again with the above - and again evidence Mr Forbes. There was not some random MK waiting in no-mans land on the off chance that some lonely girl would wander into no-mans land, an area that led to nowhere. There was absolutely NO forensic evidence of any altercation beginning anywhere other than in that area of woodland, and of course, sadly ending there too.
And the constant shaking of one's head around this missing 5ltrs - A woodland and soil, not a hard nonporous surface, bouts of heavy rainfall over the course of many hours before the forensic team arrived. Various different species of wildlife ------------
