Faith - Behave, it is nothing to do with the person and everything to do with their actions. I could be married to the woman and I would still highlight the wrong!
I, as have stated many times, make no bones in the slightest with wilful liars and manipulators, especially in something so serious, that plays with the lives of many others.
You continuously apply the personal to it, at points, with what is an overbearing, sickly sweet protection of someone doing wrong. In one hand you agree fully with the latest tactics, the lies and manipulation in play for this greater good! But do no like it being pointed out that is works across the board. You mimic her and instantly apply you knew nothing of the "leading criminologist" behave. Again, dishonest.
The point of the post was not attack - It was about using ones loaf! That false narrative touted out, does not match at all to actual reality! It only serves on repeat to highlight the strength of the evidence against Mitchell. The greater the lie the more obvious the truth!
Finding a body, hidden some 43ft from that break in the wall, completely obstructed and hidden. From a start point on a path and not in those woods, in around 6mins of actively walking off together. This is reason, solid founded reason, as to why suspicion fell upon Mitchell, not this feeble - 'a policeman wrote something wrong' To knowing this, then pushing out lies around others! is morally wrong, which you, who have shown repeatedly, have that same immoral stance, accept without batting a eye. To over-ride and erase Mitchell's lies. For the most part to try and score some imaginary point to make you appear correct - Behave.
I mentioned that 'rushing up a path' as a prime example of over riding on repeat the lies directly from Mitchell. He rushed up no path, and again, it takes little, if actually clearing ones mind from the mire, to work that out all by oneself. My slight to those who do not do this, who blindly accept without question the actions of deceitful people - And again, naff all to do with anything else other than truth, the actual evidence and so forth. It has always been why I have posted, the very reason I took to studying around this case intricately was due to that deception at play!
Taken no side, and I am not interested in any bloody side, it is about highlighting why suspicion fell upon him, why he could not be eliminated and subsequently convicted. That this does not change in the slightest the very reason why I applied, that had he walked free from court there would have been no search for any alternate killer. That is simple fact.
Could he be innocent? Does it matter, of course it does. It would take someone to step forward and say 'it was me!' which would still not place Mitchell home, it would still not disprove that without any doubt he knew that girl was dead and he knew where her body was. That if there is some slim chance he found her like this, then it is by fault of his own, no one else that he has always been far from bloody honest!
This claim of innocence around ST. a frenzied knife attack, stabbing someone repeatedly everywhere but mainly their head! Seriously! This bleat of a nice lad gone wrong, that he did not make that fatal wound to the heart - To making monsters of every Tom, Dick and bloody Harry without a bloody snifter of evidence of being involved, at all - Have a word!
