You may be right. If the samples are going to be independently tested it might come back as Luke. I for one hope it does cause if not then an innocent young life may have been destroyed. Then another house of cards should be coming down, the Scottish justice system.
Ok, now let's just have a look at that, shall we? - So, you are saying that should samples tested show LM's DNA, that would be enough to satisfy you that he was indeed the killer? There would be no "There was nothing found that could not be innocently explained away?" That you would then place both SK and LM as being the killers of that young girl, why? Because DNA and its presence is the answer to who your killer would be? - Is that correct? Therefore at this moment in time, because you feel the presence of DNA equates to guilt then SK for you is somehow complicit in this young girls death?
Interestingly though and hedging ones bets here - They are looking carefully to see which samples they may want released for testing, how does that work exactly? That they have certain results there, they can see those which could not belong to LM, as in samples he could have been eliminated from, therefore the enablers get to choose safely which samples to test? - Get my drift? So there is no and never will be this equality thing as Ms Lean suggested recently? No two sides, with just an independent person in the middle to do the testing, but that is not correct at all, IF the people choosing which samples to test are from only one side?
