Serendipity certainly didn't admit to altering the report but as the evidence has been removed I can't show you-..You also have the second part wrong..nothing has been removed from the amnesty website..doesn't change anything...amaral remains a convicted criminal
I clearly stated last night that I had taken screenshots of each of the available Amnesty International Reports for Portugal for the years 2009 to 2013 and had collated them into one screenshot as shown below. I then added my own text in red which clarified the point I was making which clearly explained the purpose of the screenshot.
Yours and others accusations last night that I have altered or falsified official documents are totally unwarranted and incorrect and I expect a full apology from you. :)
Here are the supportive links which are all referenced in the screenshot that was posted last night. Compare them all and you will clearly see that they are the same :)
2009 Amnesty International Report
http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/portugal/report-2009Reference to Cipriano case found under 'Torture and other ill-treatment'
2010 Amnesty International Report
http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/portugal/report-2010Reference to Cipriano case found under 'Torture and other ill-treatment'
2011 Amnesty International Report
http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/portugal/report-2011Reference to Cipriano case found under 'Torture and other ill-treatment'
2012 Amnesty International Report
http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/portugal/report-2012Reference to Cipriano case found under 'Torture and other ill-treatment'
But lookee here at the 2013 report, there is no longer any reference to Goncalo Amaral or Leonor Cipriano under the heading 'Torture and other ill-treatment'
http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/portugal/report-2013So Davel, why do think it is that there is now no mention of either Amaral or Cipriano in the 2013 report given that there has been in all of those years (2009 - 2012) since the original case came to court?
I'll tell you why, it is because in April 2013 Leonor Cipriano had a further 7 months added to her sentence for false testimony for lying about being tortured by the PJ. Therefore as she lied about it, Goncalo Amaral is no longer of interest regarding the Cipriano case as far as Amnesty International are concerned, hence no mention of the case in the current report.
Like I said last night, it is not rocket science :)
And now I am going out for the evening so I will be logging out and so will bid you adieu and look forward to catching up with you again :)
Oh and here is the screenshot that I posted last night :)