Alleged Miscarriages of Justice > Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003.
Luke Mitchell - Misinformation corrected.
John:
--- Quote from: ActualMat on August 15, 2012, 04:55:13 PM ---Thanks, John. You've confirmed most of what I thought and got from what I have read. There are those around that try and dillute key information which I think speaks for itself.
Sandra L is now posting on the blue forum - I guess someone told her I'd taken an interest in the case and began posting in the topic - I don't see why else she would suddenly begin posting and comment on the points I made. Which I think is my cue to stop posting about it simply because I have no interest in getting into a war of words with a PR guru type person dressed as a lawyer.
--- End quote ---
Too true but lawyer is stretching it a bit! I can tell you it was nugnug (Billy Middleton) who told her.
All you have to do is to ask her about Adrian Prout and you won't see her for dust!
Joanne:
I've just been reading the mentioned thread on thr blue forum and if I got arrested and it was a straight choice of duty solicitor, Mat or Sandra Lean, it wouldn't be a hard choice, Mat would win hands down. I don't think Sandra Lean is credible which is a shame because she looks sensible and she's obviously clever-did the Mitchell family do their homework before letting her in on the case?
John:
--- Quote from: gordo on August 15, 2012, 05:17:31 PM ---Its seems you think rather highly of yourself mat as SL did not post simply to rebuke your interest or to simply highlight this case. The fact that it continues to be eroded by simple misrepresentation by the owner of this site stands to give "PR" as you state to the case, its what we strive for as having the case in the publics mind can only help.
John took it upon himself to try and belittle the blue forum again by highlighting our misrepresentation as he puts it but once again he has been shown to be so far out when it comes to this crime that its a wonder people like yourself even begin to listen to him.
It has now been corrected and as a matter of fact to show how wrong he was the picture he went on about being 9.5 months old was in fact 6 weeks old. I do wonder why he continues when he knows very little of the crime in question
John 2/10 must do better.
--- End quote ---
You lot are so transparent and deffo so predictable. If you cannot provide any evidence of Mitchell's innocence then go on the offensive and attack everyone else. Gordo, nugnug and Sandra L are all singing from the same hymn sheet and to think I once fell for their crap. The problem for them is that I know the case inside out, I know their flaws and weaknesses and I know when they are promoting bullshit as they are over on the blue forum.
Let's face it Mitchell's entire campaign depends on blaming other innocent bystanders for the crime. I have no doubt the CCRC will reject their Application because it is based on nothing more than wild theories and supposition. If Luke Mitchell had one reliable witness who could place him at or near his home at the time of the murder he would be a free man today. The other big question of course is how a school boy who always walked home with his peers just so happened to become invisible on that particular day?
Another point worth mentioning is that Mitchell had used his knife previously to threaten a young girl and put her in fear of her life. Was this event a practice run coming just weeks before he cut Jodi's throat for real and cut it so brutally that it was nearly severed?
You won't read that in the newpapers Gordo!
ActualMat:
--- Quote from: John on August 15, 2012, 06:40:55 PM ---
--- Quote from: gordo on August 15, 2012, 05:17:31 PM ---Its seems you think rather highly of yourself mat as SL did not post simply to rebuke your interest or to simply highlight this case. The fact that it continues to be eroded by simple misrepresentation by the owner of this site stands to give "PR" as you state to the case, its what we strive for as having the case in the public mind can only help.
John took it upon himself to try and belittle the blue forum again by highlighting our misrepresentation as he puts it but once again he has been shown to be so far out when it comes to this crime that its a wonder people like yourself even begin to listen to him.
--- End quote ---
You lot are so transparent and deffo so predictable. If you cannot provide any evidence of Mitchell's innocence then go on the offensive and attack everyone else. Gordo, nugnug and Sandra L are all singing from the same hymn sheet and to think I once fell for their crap. The problem for them is that I know the case inside out, I know their flaws and weaknesses and I know when they are promoting bullshit as they are over on the blue forum.
Let's face it Mitchell's entire campaign depends on blaming other innocent bystanders for the crime. I have no doubt the CCRC will reject their Application because it is based on nothing more than wild theories and supposition. If Luke Mitchell had one reliable witness who could place him at or near his home at the time of the murder he would be a free man today. The other big question of course is how a school boy who always walked home with his peers just so happened to become invisible on that particular day?
Another point worth mentioning is that Mitchell had used his knife previously to threaten a young girl and put her in fear of her life. Was this event a practice run coming just weeks before he cut Jodi's throat for real and cut it so brutally that it was nearly severed?
You won't read that in the newpapers Gordo!
--- End quote ---
Just to know that Sandra Lean is the one behind the website tells you all you need to know and will ever need to know. The fact that she's too busy with so many cases shows the thoroughness that she approaches her cases with. I am not shocked by her comments or by her delusion of grandeur. She probably hasn't had the time to fully inform herself of the case - which is the same rubbish they throw at me - since she is so busy with multiple cases.
ActualMat:
--- Quote from: John on August 15, 2012, 05:52:12 PM ---
--- Quote from: ActualMat on August 15, 2012, 04:55:13 PM ---Thanks, John. You've confirmed most of what I thought and got from what I have read. There are those around that try and dillute key information which I think speaks for itself.
Sandra L is now posting on the blue forum - I guess someone told her I'd taken an interest in the case and began posting in the topic - I don't see why else she would suddenly begin posting and comment on the points I made. Which I think is my cue to stop posting about it simply because I have no interest in getting into a war of words with a PR guru type person dressed as a lawyer.
--- End quote ---
Too true but lawyer is stretching it a bit! I can tell you it was nugnug (Billy Middleton) who told her.
All you have to do is to ask her about Adrian Prout and you won't see her for dust!
--- End quote ---
Yeah, of course she was told I was posting about the case - why else would she show up there so suddenly. Doh!
Grahame getting involved in the topic now........... @)(++(*
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version