Of course it's popular - it's the only thing McCann sceptics have got, but yet they cannot explain why the dogs which are so reliable and world beating were not sufficient to bring the McCanns to court. If the dogs 95% definitely alerted to a body in the apartment it's pretty much an open and shut case isn't it?
I also think it's the one facet that most supporters can't reconcile fully themselves. What's the chances, right? They have to assauge the cognitive dissonance by grasping on to anything remotely congruent....the dogs are mad, the handler told Shep to bark there, they're doctors FFS, Grime and Harrison created this branch of pseudo-science in 2005, the handler is a charlatan, loads of people died there, who's idea was it anyway, rubbish batting average, coconut in Jersey, Pilley case was all circumstantial, the coppers ransacked the place, cross contamination from sea bass and sardines from boozy lunches, they weren't even the right set of pyjamas, dogs are trained on piglets I heard, that's not blood, that could be anyone's blood, the dog could smell sausages, the dog was in heat, the heat was too hot, Harrison was the puppetmaster.....
I'm still sat here on the wall of 5a since last week. Like bird shit.
