Do you really think it's fair to keep commenting on Lookout when she can't respond? Yes, I have my run-ins with Lookout but they generally case related and at least she can answer is she chooses. This is just really a free for all and a bit much now. Lookout thinks Bamber is innocent (as you do Holly) so she's not happy to write to a 'child killer' as her opinion is - that he isn't.
You could say that she could join the red forum and respond to these comments but would you?
Caroline firstly John, admin and the mods decide what is and isn't appropriate in terms of posts/threads on the UKJF but thanks for your feedback which I will discuss with John.
In terms of whether or not it is fair to comment on Lookout's posts I don't really think fair comes into it. If someone chooses to post on a public forum or such like then they need to be prepared to have their posts debated and disagreed with. Lookout is quite welcome to join UKJF where she will be treated no differently to any other member but it seems to me that it isn't necessary for Lookout to join simply to repond to posts on this thread as she is afforded a platform on Blue on which to do so eg her recent claim that I have the brain of amoeba
. Many are unable to respond to Lookout's posts eg the deceased victims and various witnesses.
Yes Lookout and I share the same view in terms of JB being the victim of a MoJ but the difference is that I mainly stick to the facts of the case and tend to steer clear of making personal comments about the victims and witnesses. I am always mindful of the fact that JB has been found in guilty in a court of law and try to find the balance between respecting this view along with prosecution witnesses and the fact I believe JB is the victim of a MoJ but I could be wrong.
I would suggest some gentle guidance for Lookout from admin/mods on Blue wouldn't go amiss.