Bamber’s dangerousness surpasses him
Carol Ann Lee is an obstacle who’s in his way - her research appears to have brought her to the conclusion he’s guilty
It’s clear she’s Bamber's new target
Are the prison monitoring his behaviour ? I suspect not
Does anyone know if Ms Lee has reported the abuse and bullying she’s been subjected to - to either the police or prison or both?
Bamber may not be ‘gagged’ from speaking with the media (
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199899/ldjudgmt/jd990708/obrien01.htm )
but his patterns of behaviour should be of concern to the prison authorities and all those who should be monitoring him and protecting the public
It’s the same pattern of behaviour he displayed after he murdered his family - This should not be ignored
Bamber’s dangerousness and exploitative and abusive nature should be in the forefront of the minds of all those who’s responsibility and focus should be on the assessment and management of the risk that prisoners like Bamber present to members of the public beyond the prison gates.
“
Freedom of expression is, of course, intrinsically important: it is valued for its own sake. But it is well recognised that it is also instrumentally important. It serves a number of broad objectives. First, it promotes the self fulfilment of individuals in society. Secondly, in the famous words of Mr. Justice Holmes (echoing John Stuart Mill), "the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market.": Abraham v. United States 250 U.S. 616, at 630 (1919), per Holmes J. (dissent). Thirdly, freedom of speech is the lifeblood of democracy. The free flow of information and ideas informs political debate. It is a safety valve: people are more ready to accept decisions that go against them if they can in principle seek to influence them. It acts as a brake on the abuse of power by public officials. It facilitates the exposure of errors in the governance and administration of justice of the country: see Stone, Seidman, Sunstein and Tushnett, Constitutional Law, 3rd ed., (1996), 1078-1086. It is this last interest which is engaged in the present case. The prisoners argue that in their cases the criminal justice system has failed, and that they have been wrongly convicted. They seek with the assistance of journalists, who have the resources to do the necessary investigations, to make public the wrongs which they allegedly suffered.”Bamber’s ‘
freedom of expression’ does not entitle him to abuse and bully members of the public - directly or indirectly - overtly or covertly
