More disappointment looming for Bamber?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I wonder if Ispy's neighbours admire her jewellery when she passes? Or maybe they just don't care. 

It would be hard to see me, Gunit, when walking down my road as all the houses are set back from the road...no curtain-twitchers here

Besides, my neighbours have their own jewellery to admire, so aren’t interested in mine, just as I’m not interested in theirs

Do you study your neighbours jewellery, then, when you’re chatting over the garden fence having a chinwag while pegging out your smalls?😌

[Nicholas]

Undoubtedly yes. Some pillocks are still repeating the smears started by Jeremy Bamber.

Some are still claiming CALs only research was searching these forums (which would still be a far better book than SL)

ITV refused all offers of help from Tru and MDB too - they didn't want to look at the new evidence - because there was obviously a secret agenda to fool people into thinking he was guilty!

You couldn't make it up, but guess who can!

How did Trudi Benjamin or Michelle Diskin Bates think they were going to help ITV re the drama series WHF ?

By telling them she was the only witness to have seen someone on live TV at the time - pacing back and forth in a bedroom window 

[Common sense]

How did Trudi Benjamin or Michelle Diskin Bates think they were going to help ITV re the drama series WHF ?

By telling them she was the only witness to have seen someone on live TV at the time - pacing back and forth in a bedroom window 

 

I think they are either delusional or it was a deliberate ploy to pretend that there actually is new evidence that ITV willfully ignored, with the subtext being that ITV is a propaganda arm of the secret services that are hell bent on concealing "the truth"

I'm going with delusional and dishonest, but amusing all the same.

[Caroline]

How did Trudi Benjamin or Michelle Diskin Bates think they were going to help ITV re the drama series WHF ?

By telling them she was the only witness to have seen someone on live TV at the time - pacing back and forth in a bedroom window 

Bet she's gutted not to have had her iPhone with her at the time 

[Nicholas]

Bet she's gutted not to have had her iPhone with her at the time 

 

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I think they are either delusional or it was a deliberate ploy to pretend that there actually is new evidence that ITV willfully ignored, with the subtext being that ITV is a propaganda arm of the secret services that are hell bent on concealing "the truth"

I'm going with delusional and dishonest, but amusing all the same.

Who’s Michelle Bates?

The plot thickens....😌

[Nicholas]

I think they are either delusional or it was a deliberate ploy to pretend that there actually is new evidence that ITV willfully ignored, with the subtext being that ITV is a propaganda arm of the secret services that are hell bent on concealing "the truth"

I'm going with delusional and dishonest, but amusing all the same.

They are delusional and dishonest

Why do they all refer to JM as a ‘scorned’ women when it’s clear she was in an abusive relationship

Why have the CT referred to Virginia Greaves but not mentioned her sister Anji

It’s obvious their understanding of the case is poor to say the least

[Common sense]

Who’s Michelle Bates?

The plot thickens....😌

Barry George's sister and fruitloop. Her endorsement is the kiss of death to anyone's claims of innocence and she endorses every claim, no matter how fraudulent. 

[Common sense]

They are delusional dishonest

Why do they all refer to JM as a ‘scorned’ women when it’s clear she was in an abusive relationship

Why have the CT referred to Virginia Greaves but not mentioned her sister Anji

It’s obvious their understanding of the case is poor to say the least

It seems to me that anyone that claims they are innocent is deified by these people. Every actor in the case becomes wicked except the self proclaimed hero of the story.

Why do they never mention Barry Georges rape conviction and try to paint him as just a harmless oddball? Is it because they really believe it?

[Nicholas]

It seems to me that anyone that claims they are innocent is deified by these people. Every actor in the case becomes wicked except the self proclaimed hero of the story.

Why do they never mention Barry Georges rape conviction and try to paint him as just a harmless oddball? Is it because they really believe it?

It’s part and parcel of the innocent fraud thematics

[Nicholas]

Barry George's sister and fruitloop. Her endorsement is the kiss of death to anyone's claims of innocence and she endorses every claim, no matter how fraudulent. 

 

[Nicholas]

They are delusional and dishonest

Why do they all refer to JM as a ‘scorned’ women when it’s clear she was in an abusive relationship

Why have the CT referred to Virginia Greaves but not mentioned her sister Anji

It’s obvious their understanding of the case is poor to say the least

Mark Newby, Bamber’s solicitor didn’t want the ITV WHF series to go ahead because they were concerned it would,

“place a fictional narrative in the public domain at a time when we have a looming High Court Challenge against the CPS”
But more importantly we’re looking after that to get this case back before the Court of Appeal. Programmes such as this don’t just get aired and disappear they stay in the mind of the public and are available online’

What about ‘Crimes that shook Britain’ and Scott Lomax’s book ?

[Nicholas]

Barry George's sister and fruitloop. Her endorsement is the kiss of death to anyone's claims of innocence and she endorses every claim, no matter how fraudulent. 

Michelle Diskin Bates Ribbon
@Michelle_Diskin
Replying to
@michael47478285
There Are None So Blind
As Those Who Will Not See
Pouting facePouting facePouting face
5:49 PM · May 4, 2020·Twitter for iPad

https://mobile.twitter.com/Michelle_Diskin/status/1257351669404360709

[Nicholas]

The whole Bamber campaign reeks of dishonesty and pretence which his dim more gullible supporters refuse to see while the more intelligent ones must pass it off as irrelevant as to his character in 1985, as though persistent lying and throwing red herrings are only a recent feature.

Latest News 19.12.19
Statement regarding the White House Farm ITV drama.
“We first became aware of a planned ITV drama about Jeremy’s case in December 2017, and took immediate steps to offer our assistance by contacting Kim Varvell at Production Company ‘New Pictures’, Commissioning Editor Kevin Lygo at ITV and writer Chris Mrska. We were willing to provide access to brand new forensic reports, our team of scientists, the case material, fresh evidence, and Jeremy and his legal team. Our offers were ignored, and we believe therefore, that the drama can only be based on factually incorrect and very out of date material.
https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/case

Bamber’s campaign is criminal

Wonder if those people named above were harassed and whether or not this behaviour was also added to Bamber’s prison security files?

[Nicholas]

Bamber’s campaign is criminal

Wonder if those people named above were harassed and whether or not this behaviour was also added to Bamber’s prison security files?

The CT don’t appear to have even a basic understanding of the facts of the case

“Wednesday 4 September 1985 – On returning to Sheila’s apartment, Jeremy received a telephone call from another girl he’d been seeing called Virginia Greaves 
https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk


Bamber wasn’t ‘seeing’ Virginia Greaves!

He was ‘seeing’ her sister Anji Greaves - their relationship started 2 days after the funerals