General discussion about the latest news (not search related)

[Alice Purjorick]

Can you provide cites for the two opposing opinions please.

Posts on this forum. One on this thread a few before this post in an excahnge with barrier. Several on other threads justifying interference by Metodo3 Brian Kennedy et al interviewing witnesses in a live criminal investigation.
You could always ask her for an unequivocal statement that in her opinion civilians interfering with a live criminal investigation is neither acceptable nor justifiable whomsoever be carrying out the interference.

[Mr Gray]

Posts on this forum. One on this thread a few before this post in an excahnge with barrier. Several on other threads justifying interference by Metodo3 Brian Kennedy et al interviewing witnesses in a live criminal investigation.
You could always ask her for an unequivocal statement that in her opinion civilians interfering with a live criminal investigation is neither acceptable nor justifiable whomsoever be carrying out the interference.

I think you will find there is a long history of family and friends trying  to help a live criminal investigation

[G-Unit]

I think you are getting worked up about nothing... One thing that has become clear is, the press, are sometimes, not too accurate..

Again... Do you think brunt is deliberately  trying to mislead.  I just can't see, why he would do that

I'm just presenting evidence which, in my opinion, demonstrates that Brunt wouldn't make that particular mistake. 

[G-Unit]

I think you will find there is a long history of family and friends trying  to help a live criminal investigation

This case or cases in general?

[Mr Gray]

I'm just presenting evidence which, in my opinion, demonstrates that Brunt wouldn't make that particular mistake.

Brunt may have been using the word joint in a more loose term... It is on the face of things a joint investigation as they are working  together on the same crime

[Mr Gray]

This case or cases in general?

.

In general

[G-Unit]

I think there is a point being missed here.  The PJ can't operate unattended in Britain and Scotland Yard can't operate unattended in Portugal.
This does not mean that there isn't a joint operation with joint cooperation.

It doesn't mean there is a joint operation with joint cooperation either, despite Brunt's implication. 

[Mr Gray]

It doesn't mean there is a joint operation with joint cooperation either, despite Brunt's implication.

It's nothing compared to the untruths printed re the mccanns [Edit: in your opinion]

[Robittybob1]

It doesn't mean there is a joint operation with joint cooperation either, despite Brunt's implication.

is that a FACT OR IS THAT AN OPINION?

[Eleanor]

It doesn't mean there is a joint operation with joint cooperation either, despite Brunt's implication.

Does Martin Brunt agree with me?  By implication, of course.

[G-Unit]

It's nothing compared to the untruths printed re the mccanns [Edit: in your opinion]

I don't see how that's relevant, Brunt is on a completely different level to those who wrote those stories in my opinion. 

[G-Unit]

is that a FACT OR IS THAT AN OPINION?

It's a response to post 3375 so I would suggest it's judged accordingly. I would say both were opinion, wouldn't you?

[Alice Purjorick]

Brunt may have been using the word joint in a more loose term... It is on the face of things a joint investigation as they are working  together on the same crime

On the face of it?
Whatever it is one of these it ain't:
JITs are now an established efficient and effective cooperation tool amongst national investigative agencies when tackling cross-border crime. They facilitate the coordination of investigations and prosecutions conducted in parallel across several States.
https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/joint-investigation-teams

[Robittybob1]

It's a response to post 3375 so I would suggest it's judged accordingly. I would say both were opinion, wouldn't you?

That is what I was thinking I noticed the post you were responding to was opinion,  but your reply came across quite like a matter of fact so I wanted you to confirm whether it was fact or opinion.
Getting to the logic "It doesn't mean [fact or opinion is true] either,  is that saying we can't be sure that the "fact or opinion in question is true" or false in other words "fact or opinion in question" is not determined?
So "It doesn't mean there is a joint operation with joint cooperation either, despite Brunt's implication." is not advancing the case either way, reminding us it is undetermined IYO.

[G-Unit]

That is what I was thinking I noticed the post you were responding to was opinion,  but your reply came across quite like a matter of fact so I wanted you to confirm whether it was fact or opinion.

Was there a particular reason for writing in capitals?