General discussion about the latest news (not search related)

[barrier]

Give me a chance to wake up ey? but I never posted anything about me considering Murat anything so you're wandering off the subject a wee bit there. I only posted the fact the latest documentary states as a matter of fact that Tanner ID'd Murat. End of, because it does and now you and everyone else can hear it for themselves thanks to good old Rob's cite.

The accuracy can be debated for ever and a day,but its there as clear as day to listen to as you point out.

[barrier]

So why specifically bring this point to the attention of this Forum?

That could be asked of any point brought to the forum,it'll not matter one iota in the case of the dissapearence.

[Eleanor]

Why not if the thread title is latest news and this latest documentary was the first to state has a matter of fact that Tanner ID'd Murat? Should I private message you for the OK prior to posting?

No.  Carry on digging your own hole.  Your comments will be deleted if they are Libellous.

[Mr Gray]

Why not if the thread title is latest news and this latest documentary was the first to state has a matter of fact that Tanner ID'd Murat? Should I private message you for the OK prior to posting?

Let's just say she did... What is it's, significance

[Eleanor]

Big deal, you really think that's a hole? Delete whatever you want if it makes you feel in some way better.
How can my comments be libelous if they have been broadcast on UK TV twice this week?

Some of the comments in this video could be Libellous.  In which case repeating them would be Libellous.

Did you know this?

[Mr Gray]

Remember when sceptics were claiming Murat was suing sine of the Tapas.... They simply would not listen to reason

[Eleanor]

Remember when sceptics were claiming Murat was suing sine of the Tapas.... They simply would not listen to reason

I remember that.  I wonder why he didn't.

[Mr Gray]

Davel read through the thread. I don't give a toss at this point what Tanner did. The point I made and have been repeatedly pulled up on, is that the latest documentary which aired twice on UK TV states as a matter of fact that Jane Tanner ID'd Murat.

Even with Rob providing a verbatim cite they are still in denial. That's their problem, not mine as far as I'm concerned.

If you don't give a toss... Why all the fuss... Sceptics seem to argue for hours over points that have no significance

[barrier]

If you don't give a toss... Why all the fuss... Sceptics seem to argue for hours over points that have no significance

They don't argue between themselves,so who carries on the argument.

[Eleanor]

I've been having loads of fun with this one. There's no fuss on my part, just a verbatim cite to support my original post. 

You've been having loads of fun with this one.  Precisely.  Has your spade hit the bottom of the hole yet?

[Mr Gray]

I've been having loads of fun with this one. There's no fuss on my part, just a verbatim cite to support my original post. 

That's why I refuse to get into some debates... They are pointless... What we have now is a situation where the PJ are talking about a suspected kidnapper... That's far more interesting

[barrier]

That's why I refuse to get into some debates... They are pointless... What we have now is a situation where the PJ are talking about a suspected kidnapper... That's far more interesting

No they are not,its paper talk,the PJ made no such comment.

[Eleanor]

What hole's that then?

That you are just here to cause trouble for a bit of fun.

[barrier]

What hole's that then?

Bernard Cribbins.
"Your digging it round and it ought to be square
The shape of it's wrong, it's much too long
And you can't put hole where a hole don't belong I ask, what a liberty eh"

[Mr Gray]

Ah.. Surgical Mask Man, now that is interesting.. Is the suspect a doctor perhaps? They are very familiar with surgical masks aren't they.?

call grange immediately