Amaral and the dogs

[stephen25000]

Bwhahaha!



Did Amaral actually say that?


No wonder he got things so wrong.

How much do you know about D.N.A. analysis in forensic science ?

Would it be more or less than Amaral ? &%+((£

[Eleanor]

It was much simpler than that at the beginning. Just a story that didn't add up, that's all.

It adds up for me.  And I was a McCann Sceptic in the beginning.  Even more so after I saw The Levy Videos, which were seriously edited, although I didn't know that at the time, anymore than anyone else did.  Perhaps Amaral made the same mistake.

Jesus H, I am seriously ashamed of some of the things I said.

I finally came to my current beliefs by reading the value of "Sources", common sense and the use of logistics.
It simply isn't possible for The McCanns to have done what they were accused of.

Oh, and by the way, I very conveniently forgot that I had done the same thing that they did.  But at least I wasn't slow in admitting it when I did remember.

Amaral had an agenda with The Cipriano Case hanging over his head.  He needed a conviction to get himself out of the shit.  It really is as simple as that.

[pathfinder73]

I have often seen that claim made for Eddie.
I have often seen a request for a cite to substantiate the claim being made.
I have never seen anything to prove what you claim for Eddie is true ... I have seen Morse's qualifications officially and independently endorsed ... I have never seen any independent endorsement for Eddie.

Interesting though to notice the ease with which cadaver scent contamination can be transferred. 

I also noticed that in Mr Roses's case a body was found proving Eddie right.

Now you know how Eddie found the clue about CC. Moved neatly on the bed after handling a cadaver so it became cadaver contaminated. That pink blanket would have been alerted to had it been handled and moved but it's missing.

[Eleanor]

Now you know how Eddie found the clue about CC. Moved neatly on the bed after handling a cadaver so it became cadaver contaminated. That pink blanket would have been alerted to had it been handled and moved but it's missing.

When did this happen?  Before or during dinner?

[Alfred R Jones]

Now you know how Eddie found the clue about CC. Moved neatly on the bed after handling a cadaver so it became cadaver contaminated. That pink blanket would have been alerted to had it been handled and moved but it's missing.

So, everything that "Smithman" handled after hiding the body became contaminated, or did he come back, move CC, then immediately wash and disinfect his hands...? 

[ferryman]

Now you know how Eddie found the clue about CC. Moved neatly on the bed after handling a cadaver so it became cadaver contaminated. That pink blanket would have been alerted to had it been handled and moved but it's missing.

Kate gave the blanket to GNR dog-handlers so that they could (at least attempt to!) prime their dogs with Madeleine's scent.

It was never 'missing'.

[sadie]

Now you know how Eddie found the clue about CC. Moved neatly on the bed after handling a cadaver so it became cadaver contaminated. That pink blanket would have been alerted to had it been handled and moved but it's missing.

You've got a short memory Pfinder

Eddie picked Ccat up and threw it up in the air.  He didn't alert to it



Even when it was placed at the bottom of the cupboard, Eddie sniffed really close, inches from it, twice, but did not alert either time.

Later, after Martin G had insisted Eddie checked the counter above,  he alerted to a pile of folders, papers on the top of the cupboard counter.  These were feet away from CCat.

Martin mistakenly took that as an alert to CCat.

Eddie was alerting to the papers.


Eddie DID NOT alert to CCat.

[Brietta]

Now you know how Eddie found the clue about CC. Moved neatly on the bed after handling a cadaver so it became cadaver contaminated. That pink blanket would have been alerted to had it been handled and moved but it's missing.

Do you know offhand if any of the people who like to ask questions have gone to the bother to ascertain why Mr Amaral did not invite the dogs in when they were offered at a time when they might actually have made a positive contribution to finding Madeleine McCann?

[G-Unit]

Do you know offhand if any of the people who like to ask questions have gone to the bother to ascertain why Mr Amaral did not invite the dogs in when they were offered at a time when they might actually have made a positive contribution to finding Madeleine McCann?

Do you have a source telling us that the dogs were offered in May (apart from 'A senior police spokesperson' quoted in The Sun for obvious reasons)

[Alfred R Jones]

Do you have a source telling us that the dogs were offered in May (apart from 'A senior police spokesperson' quoted in The Sun for obvious reasons)

Could you please explain what you mean by "for obvious reasons"?  Thanks.

[G-Unit]

Could you please explain what you mean by "for obvious reasons"?  Thanks.

That's not a reliable source.

[Alfred R Jones]

That's not a reliable source.

I get you.

[Brietta]

That's not a reliable source.

If the Sun is not reliable enough for you on this occasion how did they know about 'the best dogs in the world' when the newspaper hit the stands on 23 May 2007 before Eddie and Keela had set a doggy paw on Portuguese soil?

[G-Unit]

If the Sun is not reliable enough for you on this occasion how did they know about 'the best dogs in the world' when the newspaper hit the stands on 23 May 2007 before Eddie and Keela had set a doggy paw on Portuguese soil?

They had written about these dogs before, they were big news apparently with Keela earning more than the Chief Constable of Yorkshire. Just follow Brietta's original link, it's all there.

[Alfred R Jones]

They had written about these dogs before, they were big news apparently with Keela earning more than the Chief Constable of Yorkshire. Just follow Brietta's original link, it's all there.

But we can dismiss this as hogwash as it was in the Sun, correct?