Author Topic: Amaral and the dogs  (Read 841574 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mercury

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2070 on: August 11, 2015, 09:22:15 PM »
Not just because?

Ian Horrocks made reference to the irrelevant behaviour of the dogs ....

Well, Im sure you loved and agreed with his "comments", whoever this is
If sniffer dogs "behaviour" was "irrelevant" they would not be used in the first place




ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2071 on: August 11, 2015, 09:30:38 PM »
Well, Im sure you loved and agreed with his "comments", whoever this is
If sniffer dogs "behaviour" was "irrelevant" they would not be used in the first place

As a generic statement, that is, of course, untrue.

With specific reference to PdL and the McCanns, it's fair to say that if the dogs had been deployed properly, the McCanns might never have been made arguidos.

Admittedly, with a loose cannon like Amaral, that can't be said certainly. 

Amaral might have found some other pretext or excuse ....

Offline mercury

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2072 on: August 11, 2015, 10:36:37 PM »
As a generic statement, that is, of course, untrue.

With specific reference to PdL and the McCanns, it's fair to say that if the dogs had been deployed properly, the McCanns might never have been made arguidos.

Admittedly, with a loose cannon like Amaral, that can't be said certainly. 

Amaral might have found some other pretext or excuse ....

So do tell where Mr Grime was incompetent, or rather don't, as we have heard  it all before and without a shred of evidence

Amaral and his team could say or suggest or surmise whatever they thought, but it wasn't up to them if the Mccanns were made arguidos
« Last Edit: August 11, 2015, 10:55:27 PM by mercury »

Offline mercury

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2073 on: August 12, 2015, 12:35:01 AM »
So, police DO change the  course in an investigation from missing when dogs are brought in, silly UK police hey? Its only the Portuguese who are supposed to do that!

He was questioned as a witness in a missing person case, a status that changed when sniffer dogs indicated that a body had been in Pacteau’s car. DNA samples taken from his apartment showed traces of Ms Buckley’s blood.

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/he-robbed-us-of-our-beautiful-daughter-and-sister-buckley-family-issue-statement-690536.html

Offline pegasus

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2074 on: August 12, 2015, 01:21:40 AM »
@Anna This image you posted is interesting. Did you only brighten it, and nothing else? 

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2075 on: August 12, 2015, 07:12:22 AM »
Well, Im sure you loved and agreed with his "comments", whoever this is
If sniffer dogs "behaviour" was "irrelevant" they would not be used in the first place

The dogs are used to find evidence and they are very good at it. In this case the dogs found no evidence

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2076 on: August 12, 2015, 07:37:20 AM »
The dogs are used to find evidence and they are very good at it. In this case the dogs found no evidence

Rollocks.

The dogs alerted.

Forensic results were inconclusive.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2077 on: August 12, 2015, 07:38:35 AM »
Rollocks.

The dogs alerted.

Forensic results were inconclusive.

the dogs found no evidence...fact

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2078 on: August 12, 2015, 07:38:53 AM »
A message for members  of this Forum who do not believe that cadaver dogs have been tested on recently dead individuals

http://www.pawsoflife.org/Library/HRD/Oesterhelweg%201998.pdf

'' Both men (A and B)
had publicly collapsed and died despite comprehensive resuscitative efforts. At
the start of our investigation, the postmortem interval for both men (A and B)
was measured at 110 and 120 min, respectively''

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2079 on: August 12, 2015, 07:39:40 AM »
the dogs found no evidence...fact

Rubbish.

The forensics were inconclusive.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2080 on: August 12, 2015, 07:40:29 AM »
"He was questioned as a witness in a missing person case, a status that changed when sniffer dogs indicated that a body had been in Pacteau's car."

http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/he-robbed-us-of-our-beautiful-daughter-and-sister-buckley-family-issue-statement-690536.html

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2081 on: August 12, 2015, 07:42:32 AM »
Rubbish.

The forensics were inconclusive.

the dogs found no evidence

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2082 on: August 12, 2015, 07:45:09 AM »
the dogs found no evidence

Evidence YES.

Forensics were inconclusive.

Now which group of people messed up the crime scene before the police got there ?


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2083 on: August 12, 2015, 07:47:30 AM »
Evidence YES.

Forensics were inconclusive.

Now which group of people messed up the crime scene before the police got there ?

the dogs found no evidence

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2084 on: August 12, 2015, 07:50:47 AM »
the dogs found no evidence

The dogs alerted, that is evidence.

Now if the dogs hadn't alerted............................... 8)--))