Amaral and the dogs

[Mr Gray]

Did he dismiss them.

Again, just to remind you, it wasn't Grime's job to say yes or no.

That was the job of the forensic scientists involved.

what good is a forensic scientist when there is nothing recovered to analyse...sweet FA

[Mr Gray]

LOL, now that is real funny

tell us why...you cannot...the post makes perfect sense and you are reduced to name calling

[mercury]

For 8 years peeps expert and amateur have completely missed the elementary solution to the PMI issue IMO.

Seeing as you dont know what happened in that flat between 5.30 and 10 pm I dont think you can dictate anything  about PMIs

[mercury]

tell us why...you cannot...the post makes perfect sense and you are reduced to name calling

Your post was illogical and I didnt name call, are you imagining things again? Or projecting, seeing as you use derogatory phrases to several posters when you realise you are losing  an argument

[ferryman]

Eddie did bark when screening the clothes, he only barks when he has found the scent he is trained to find. Why are you trying  to rewrite history?

Eddie's act of picking stuff up in his mouth was an untrained and deleterious act.

I take it you don't dispute that fact?

[mercury]

Eddie's act of picking stuff up in his mouth was an untrained and deleterious act.

I take it you don't dispute that fact?

So why did he alert? No one forced him to

Eddie has behaved differently on other occasions, when he scented the body of Bob Rose, he dug for it, and found it, he hadnt been trained for that either

[ferryman]

So why did he alert? No one forced him to

Eddie has behaved differently on other occasions, when he scented the body of Bob Rose, he dug for it, and found it, he hadnt been trained for that either

He barked.

There's not a shred of evidence he alerted.

[mercury]

He barked.

There's not a shred of evidence he alerted.

 


.......

Eddie's  bark WAS the alert, I am seriously worrying about you now, never mind though, your problem, not mine

[Mr Gray]

Your post was illogical and I didnt name call, are you imagining things again? Or projecting, seeing as you use derogatory phrases to several posters when you realise you are losing  an argument

there is no argument as you have failed to say why you find my post funny...you are deflecting because you cannot fault the logic

[ferryman]

.......

Eddie's  bark WAS the alert, I am seriously worrying about you now, never mind though, your problem, not mine

No connection can be made between his bark and his (untrained and deleterious) act of picking stuff up in his mouth.

[mercury]

there is no argument as you have failed to say why you find my post funny...you are deflecting because you cannot fault the logic

alerts to residual scent are not nothing even if they cant be corroborated

[mercury]

No connection can be made between his bark and his (untrained and deleterious) act of picking stuff up in his mouth.

Now you are being silly. Eddie barks when he has found cadaver scent. Fact.
Eddie alerted when screenng the clothes. Fact.
2 + 2 = 4

You just cannot say Eddie did not alert to the clothes unless you come  up wth a reason why he did alert, its not rocket science

[Mr Gray]

alerts to residual scent are not nothing even if they cant be corroborated

Your obvious mistake
Who says the alerts are to residual scent... Grime doesn't

[stephen25000]

what good is a forensic scientist when there is nothing recovered to analyse...sweet FA

There were materials recovered.

However, it was a crime scene contaminated before the arrival of the police.

Do keep up.

[mercury]

Your obvious mistake
Who says the alerts are to residual scent... Grime doesn't

Seeing as there were no remains, they were to residual scent