Author Topic: Amaral and the dogs  (Read 841672 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2805 on: August 17, 2015, 10:33:55 PM »
187 pages and losing the will to live.....
and that is just this thread on the cadaver dog

 &%&£(+

Well this is England and we are a nation of dog lovers.
In North Korea this thread would be entitled "Menu".
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline mercury

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2806 on: August 17, 2015, 11:03:49 PM »
Well this is England and we are a nation of dog lovers.
In North Korea this thread would be entitled "Menu".


 @)(++(*

but also


 8)><(

You dont want to know what Ive eaten in China! Thought it tasted a bit funny, but wasn't told till after.


Rabbit stew is ok though, but not wild boar, the most evil thing Ive ever eaten (was called game pie in the canteen, (here in uk) , I assumed it was pheasant or something relatively safe to try, never again)


« Last Edit: August 17, 2015, 11:20:10 PM by mercury »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2807 on: August 18, 2015, 07:30:20 AM »
187 pages and losing the will to live.....
and that is just this thread on the cadaver dog

 &%&£(+

You have missed the point here....This thread has just discovered something that has not been discussed before...the fact that the videos of the dogs have been heavily edited showing the alerts to be of even less use than we thought.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2808 on: August 18, 2015, 07:38:14 AM »
You have missed the point here....This thread has just discovered something that has not been discussed before...the fact that the videos of the dogs have been heavily edited showing the alerts to be of even less use than we thought.

Who did the 'editing' ?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2809 on: August 18, 2015, 07:44:54 AM »
Who did the 'editing' ?

Morals' boyfriend
Levy

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2810 on: August 18, 2015, 07:46:10 AM »
Morals' boyfriend
Levy

So where is the source material ?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2811 on: August 18, 2015, 07:49:28 AM »
So where is the source material ?

Levy is a journalist.... We don't know exactly how he got hold of them
We know from a statement by a Pj officer in the files that they have been heavily edited as I have already explained

Offline Eleanor

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2812 on: August 18, 2015, 08:07:30 AM »
Levy is a journalist.... We don't know exactly how he got hold of them
We know from a statement by a Pj officer in the files that they have been heavily edited as I have already explained

And Levy's monicker is all over them, re Copyright.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2813 on: August 18, 2015, 08:18:43 AM »
Levy is a journalist.... We don't know exactly how he got hold of them
We know from a statement by a Pj officer in the files that they have been heavily edited as I have already explained

Have you ever seen a 'video' which hasn't been edited ?

Without the source material, comparisons remain just hot air.

and what precisely does heavily edited mean ?

Have any 'videos' the mccanns have done been heavily edited to try and show the mccanns in a good light ?

 *&*%£

Offline Carana

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2814 on: August 18, 2015, 08:22:30 AM »
They've obviously been edited as there are some evident cuts  (e.g., the CC sequences). However, the extended versions that Levy uploaded (relatively recently taken down by the hosting service) weren't later edited, then reuploaded. As this argument has been going on for ages, I checked the date when I first saw them against the date when they were uploaded before they got taken down.

If he edited them, then he did so before uploading them the first time. However, it makes more sense to me that he just somehow got hold of and uploaded the videos already edited by the PJ. The PJ only wanted the "damning evidence" moments, not hours of faffing around.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2815 on: August 18, 2015, 08:29:19 AM »
Have you ever seen a 'video' which hasn't been edited ?

Without the source material, comparisons remain just hot air.

and what precisely does heavily edited mean ?

Have any 'videos' the mccanns have done been heavily edited to try and show the mccanns in a good light ?

 *&*%£

not hot air due to the statement by the PJ

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2816 on: August 18, 2015, 08:33:56 AM »
not hot air due to the statement by the PJ

Unless the original material can be looked at comparisons are irrelevant.

So dave have videos featuring the mccanns been heavily edited for public consumption ?

Offline Carana

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2817 on: August 18, 2015, 08:39:14 AM »
Unless the original material can be looked at comparisons are irrelevant.

So dave have videos featuring the mccanns been heavily edited for public consumption ?

They HAVE been heavily edited, but weren't intended for public consumption.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2818 on: August 18, 2015, 08:39:33 AM »
Unless the original material can be looked at comparisons are irrelevant.

So dave have videos featuring the mccanns been heavily edited for public consumption ?

The pj officer who made the statement has told us what really happened...are you calling him a liar

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #2819 on: August 18, 2015, 08:43:22 AM »
The pj officer who made the statement has told us what really happened...are you calling him a liar


Videos get edited all the time.

Now try answering my questions.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2015, 08:48:53 AM by Eleanor »