Amaral and the dogs

[Alfred R Jones]

Perhaps there had been another death there previously or pig and coconut based fertiliser contaminants were present along with decaying vegetation tracked in on the dog`s paws.

With so many possible contaminants, "Careful Hans" need never be involved anywhere.......ever.

Your facetiousness is noted and dismissed.

[Carew]

Mystified and saddened ... but just the perils of treading the Madeleine McCann boards where there is such apparent ill wishing towards a missing little girl.

Perhaps relating your reply to the actual content of the post might help rather than what you imagine it said.

[Carew]

Your facetiousness is noted and dismissed.

All have been mentioned here as possible sources of contaminants at sites.

[Alice Purjorick]

Concerning the other indicated crimes, they are no more than that and despite our perception that, due to its high degree of probability, the occurrence of a homicide cannot be discarded, such cannot be more than a mere supposition, due to the lack of sustaining elements in the files.

The non involvement of the arguidos parents of Madeleine in any penally relevant action seems to result from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when she disappeared, from the normal behaviour that they adopted until said disappearance and afterwards, as can be amply concluded from the witness statements, from the telephone communications analysis and also from the forensics' conclusions, namely the Reports from the FSS and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine.

To this can be added that, in reality, none of the indications that led to their constitution as arguidos was later confirmed or consolidated.[/u] If not, let us see: the information concerning a previous alert of the media before the polices was not confirmed, the traces that were marked by the dogs were not ratified in laboratory, and the initial indications from the above transcribed email, better clarified at a later date, ended up being revealed as innocuous.

Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the English friends that were with them on holiday there, they had no known friends or contacts in Portugal.

OK then Ferryman you can be the third supporter I have asked to post a link to the archiving report so we can read it all rather than the cut and paste bits.
The last two supporters I asked ignored the request and/or bottled out. Are you going to make it a prile?

[misty]

We know that the UK dogs are trained on decomposing piglets. Presumably, the scent of adult pigs differs somewhat to that of humans. Does anyone know if the cadaver scent of a baby/young child differs to that of an adult? Are cadaver dogs in the US trained with decomposing remains from humans of various ages?

[Alfred R Jones]

All have been mentioned here as possible sources of contaminants at sites.

So?  Your response to my last point was facetious was it not?  Or were you actually being sincere?  Ho ho.

[Brietta]

Perhaps relating your reply to the actual content of the post might help rather than what you imagine it said.

                                                              Ditto.

[Mr Gray]

OK then Ferryman you can be the third supporter I have asked to post a link to the archiving report so we can read it all rather than the cut and paste bits.
The last two supporters I asked ignored the request and/or bottled out. Are you going to make it a prile?

Or couldnt be bothered

[ferryman]

I did not say the report used the word insufficient.
Post a link to the Archiving Report then we can all read what it says not what posters say it says.
How does the report support their innocence?

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LEGAL_SUMMARY.htm

[Mr Gray]

It seems we have another reason for doubting the alerts
Eddie always makes a positive alert and others are left to debate what it means

[stephen25000]

It seems we have another reason for doubting the alerts
Eddie always makes a positive alert and others are left to debate what it means

You are speaking for a very limited number of people.

[ferryman]

You are speaking for a very limited number of people.

From the quarters of cyberspace you inhabit, probably none ....

[Carew]

                                                              Ditto.

Glad you agree.   

[Mr Gray]

You are speaking for a very limited number of people.

As you do

[stephen25000]

As you do

Dream on.