Author Topic: Amaral and the dogs  (Read 841672 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4350 on: August 29, 2015, 08:22:44 AM »
In a nutshell, the handler of a dog trained to alert to the scent of dead bodies says that the dog alerted in places in 5a and a dog trained to alert to the scent of blood did not alert in the same place.

Uncorroborated cadaver-dog alerts are NOT acceptable as evidence in English courts.

And I'm pretty sure the alerts in the (first) PdL investigation would have been rejected in a Scottish court as well because (among other reasons) of wholesale disregard of the principle of cross-contamination.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4351 on: August 29, 2015, 08:28:51 AM »
They [the dogs] may be able to detect whether a dead body has been transported in one of the vehicles for intelligence purposes or detect human blood deposits that can be recovered and
examined in a laboratory for Madeleine McCann's blood.


(Mark Harrison)

Intelligence is not acceptable as evidence in court.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4352 on: August 29, 2015, 08:36:57 AM »
Uncorroborated cadaver-dog alerts are NOT acceptable as evidence in English courts.

And I'm pretty sure the alerts in the (first) PdL investigation would have been rejected in a Scottish court as well because (among other reasons) of wholesale disregard of the principle of cross-contamination.

I didn't say they did. If you think my statement was incorrect, please point out where?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4353 on: August 29, 2015, 08:40:48 AM »
I didn't say they did. If you think my statement was incorrect, please point out where?

Eddie's alerts were inherently unreliable in PdL.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4354 on: August 29, 2015, 08:43:32 AM »
Eddie's alerts were inherently unreliable in PdL.

Fine so my statement was correct.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4355 on: August 29, 2015, 08:46:12 AM »
Fine so my statement was correct.

Your statement is irrelevant. 

The dogs were poorly handled and their alerts meaningless.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4356 on: August 29, 2015, 08:49:38 AM »
Your statement is irrelevant. 

The dogs were poorly handled and their alerts meaningless.
?{)(**
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4357 on: August 29, 2015, 09:00:34 AM »
Your statement is irrelevant. 

The dogs were poorly handled and their alerts meaningless.

How many years experience have you as a dog handler ferryman ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4358 on: August 29, 2015, 09:05:27 AM »
How many years experience have you as a dog handler ferryman ?

How many years' experience have you had?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4359 on: August 29, 2015, 09:05:42 AM »
How many years experience have you as a dog handler ferryman ?

His experience comes down to googling, as he admitted himself.

So perhaps he should google up on cardiac surgery.

I'm sure that will qualify him for surgical procedures 8(*(

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4360 on: August 29, 2015, 09:06:30 AM »
How many years' experience have you had?

Try answering the question before you pose one.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4361 on: August 29, 2015, 09:08:01 AM »
yes I can...you never learn do you

You never have backed up any of your personal claims.

They remain pure fiction.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4362 on: August 29, 2015, 09:11:42 AM »
However, it must be stated any such indications without any physical evidence to support them can not have any evidential value, being unconfirmed indications. Additionally I consider no inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence.

(Mark Harrison)

He went on to state that if death has occurred, he thought it most likely that Madeleine's remains had been jettisoned into the sea.

Note the crucial if.

How many years' experience has Harrison had?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4363 on: August 29, 2015, 09:15:47 AM »
How many years' experience have you had?

None. That's why I leave it to the experts.

So how many ferryman ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4364 on: August 29, 2015, 09:17:51 AM »
None. That's why I leave it to the experts.

In which case you will pay particular heed to the words of Mark Harrison which I quote above.