Amaral and the dogs

[Mr Gray]

I was just posting an English definition of human remains rather than have to rely on Oregon State.

What did the reports say? Were analyses done for DNA?

And your definition confirmed no human remains were found

[Alfred R Jones]

You said:
I thought I did but you've made me doubt myself so I'd be grateful if you could enlighten me, thanks in advance.
I gave you my opinion. It may be right it may be wrong but that is the opinion I stick with. Make of it what you will it is fairly well laid out and doesn't really need interminable questions to clarify it.

In my opinion it does, and as we know all opinions are equally valid.

[stephen25000]

There were no human remains found
You are propagating a lie
Propagating a lie is not telling a lie...

You do not know if human remains/residues were found that indicated a body.

THE FORENSIC RESULTS WERE INCONCLUSIVE.

[Jean-Pierre]

You do not know if human remains/residues were found that indicated a body.

THE FORENSIC RESULTS WERE INCONCLUSIVE.

Do you actually know what "inconclusive" means?

Here is a link to the FSS reports from the files.

Can you find anything at all in these reports which supports the view that the dogs alerted to Madeleine's corpse?

[stephen25000]

Do you actually know what "inconclusive" means?

Here is a link to the FSS reports from the files.

Can you find anything at all in these reports which supports the view that the dogs alerted to Madeleine's corpse?

I do know what inconclusive means.

The forensic reports did neither confirm or dismiss , that the dogs alerted to a body.

This is old ground and you are not going to change my views on the case.

[Jean-Pierre]

I do know what inconclusive means.

The forensic reports did neither confirm or dismiss , that the dogs alerted to a body.

This is old ground and you are not going to change my views on the case.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id268.html

Here is the link - a challenge. 

Can you find one thing in the FSS report (upon which you are apparently basing your opinions) that supports the view that the dogs were alerting to Madeleine's corpse?

Or are you of the "my mind is made up, please do not confuse me with the facts" brigade. 

[stephen25000]

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id268.html

Here is the link - a challenge. 

Can you find one thing in the FSS report (upon which you are apparently basing your opinions) that supports the view that the dogs were alerting to Madeleine's corpse?

Or are you of the "my mind is made up, please do not confuse me with the facts" brigade. 

Perhaps you should read again.

As to making up your mind, what about you jp ?

So do you believe she was abducted, when there is no evidence whatsoever to show that she did ?

[Alfred R Jones]

It is quite absurd for anyone to suggest that human remains were discovered in the Madeleine McCann case, honestly some people and their semantic games....

[stephen25000]

It is quite absurd for anyone to suggest that human remains were discovered in the Madeleine McCann case, honestly some people and their semantic games....

It is you and your fellows playing games alfred.

That's par for the course though.

Have a good afternoon.

[ferryman]

You mean the FSS sent a report saying:
Nil.

Zilch

Blank.

Odd that.

Nothing to report (on what might, or might not have happened to Madeleine).

No clue.

Correct.

[Alfred R Jones]

It is you and your fellows playing games alfred.

That's par for the course though.

Have a good afternoon.

What game am I playing?  Is it correct to say that human remains have been discovered in the McCann case?  Seriously?? 

[Jean-Pierre]

Perhaps you should read again.

As to making up your mind, what about you jp ?

So do you believe she was abducted, when there is no evidence whatsoever to show that she did ?

I do not claim to know what actually happened to her.

My opinion that she was abducted is based on a number of things.

If she had died in the apartment, or been murdered by one or more of the tapas 9, then it is very likely there would have been some forensic trace. 

I have not seen a single forensic report that suggests any untoward event having taken place. 

Which leaves us with the only possible alternative - that she was taken from the apartment. 

It is unlikely the McCanns had the opportunity or indeed motive to do so.

So that leaves abduction.  A crime which does not necessarily leave any forensic trace.  Especially if the entry and exit were by the front door. 

[Mr Gray]

You do not know if human remains/residues were found that indicated a body.

THE FORENSIC RESULTS WERE INCONCLUSIVE.

You have stated human remains were found
On what facts do you base this absurd statement
If human remains were found the alerts are confimed

[Mr Gray]

You do not know if human remains/residues were found that indicated a body.

THE FORENSIC RESULTS WERE INCONCLUSIVE.

Human remains are specifically from a dead person

[Alice Purjorick]

And your definition confirmed no human remains were found

What was the DNA taken from?