Japan seeking big concessions from Britain in trade talks
Lack of clarity about UK-EU trading relationship after Brexit also holding up progress
Japan is seeking tougher concessions from Britain in trade talks than it secured from the EU, while negotiations between London and Tokyo are also being slowed by the looming risk of no-deal Brexit.
Japanese trade negotiators are confident they can extract better terms, the Financial Times reported, in a sign of the mounting difficulties facing UK officials as they attempt to line up post-Brexit trade deals around the world.
Japan and the EU began trading under a new free trade agreement this month, an arrangement that will be unavailable to the UK after Brexit. While officials from the UK and Japan are seeking to agree a bilateral deal, it will not be in place before 29 March when Britain is scheduled to leave the EU.
The UK’s trade with Japan will also revert to World Trade Organization tariffs in the case of a no-deal Brexit.The Department for International Trade (DIT) told business leaders this week that time was running out for Britain to roll-over trade deals with about 60 countries the EU has free trade arrangements with, which the UK benefits from until it leaves the bloc. Barring a handful of small and medium-sized countries, including Chile and the Faroe Islands, the majority of deals are expected to miss the deadline.
One attendee at the meeting said the lack of clarity about the UK’s trading relationship with the EU after Brexit had held up progress, and that the
Japan-EU deal included a “most-favoured nation” clause that meant Tokyo could not offer anything better on trade in services to Britain than it had given to the EU.https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/feb/08/japan-seeking-big-concessions-from-britain-in-trade-talks-eu-brexit?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_b-gdnnews&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1549656696Any bi- or multilateral trade agreement in the world that has an MFN clause in it will not be able to offer the UK better terms than it has agreed with the partners of that agreement.
Therefore, the
best that the UK could get from any of those countries bound by an agreement is the same.* Due to the relatively small size of the UK market compared to that of the EU, plus the fact that the UK will be seen as desperate, who has the upper hand?
* One caveat to that
might be if the agreement doesn't cover whatever it may be that the UK wants, but I'm not sure.