McKay says that the conviction may be unsafe, he does not say Bamber is innocent! Apparently he knows more about Sheila Caffell than Colin Caffell, what a load of crap. He refers to Sheila as being acutely mentally ill. Can people so afflicted suddenly gain the knowledge to use a rifle and overpower her much taller stronger father?
Does anyone get the sense that McKay has been hoodwinked by the master now?
Not at all John..............think he knows exactly what he's doing.
Do you think McKay is working for Bamber or for himself?
When McKay took on the Bamber case..it was big news at the CCRC and at our firm. Not because it was time to take notice of the Bamber case because it actually had someone worknig on it now but because it was simon McKay... it was a topic of ......amusment.
"Why is McKay getting involved with Bamber? He's got money issues, Bamber doesn't pay his legal team, Bamber can't pay his legal team."
It was beleived that McKay thought there would be enough 'evidence' to get this pushed through the CCRC and then legal aid would come his way - that was the only explanation I ever heard people give to why McKay is really into this case.
He needs that money.
You don't need me to tell you about his court cases and the money he owes, you've all discovered that for yourself. McKay can't think Bamber is innocnet, just that there is a chance the case may be referred or the conviction quashed, not becuase that is the right thing to do but because he believes he can do it.