New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Holly Goodhead]

and yet we repeatedly hear from sceptics that the McCanns havent been proven innocent..its absurd isnt it

Not really no.  All the stats show when small children disappear/come to harm its usually at the hands of those connected with them.  Mc's by their own admission were the last known people to have contact with MM.  Conversely there's no evidence CB ever set eyes on MM. 

[Mr Gray]

Not really no.  All the stats show when small children disappear/come to harm its usually at the hands of those connected with them.  Mc's by their own admission were the last known people to have contact with MM.  Conversely there's no evidence CB ever set eyes on MM.

Suspects do not have to prove innocence is the point.. Surely you understand that.

Then of course... You don't know what evidence there is against CB.
HCW says he's concerned re double jeopardy which suggests he has enough evidence to go to trial

[Holly Goodhead]

Suspects do not have to prove innocence is the point.. Surely you understand that.

Then of course... You don't know what evidence there is against CB.
HCW says he's concerned re double jeopardy which suggests he has enough evidence to go to trial

You were referring to 'sceptics'' beliefs.  Your post:

and yet we repeatedly hear from sceptics that the McCanns havent been proven innocent..its absurd isnt it

Its hardly surprising a body of people suspect Mc's given their proximity to MM.

Has HCW stated he's concerned about double jeopardy or is that just media reporting?  If CB moves to the other prison will he still be under HCW's jurisdicition or will another prosecutor take over?  If CB hasn't been charged say by June will you accept its game over?

[G-Unit]

and yet we repeatedly hear from sceptics that the McCanns havent been proven innocent..its absurd isnt it

That's mostly been pointed out in response to the absurd claim by their libel lawyer that they had been proved innocent.

[G-Unit]

Suspects do not have to prove innocence is the point.. Surely you understand that.

Then of course... You don't know what evidence there is against CB.
HCW says he's concerned re double jeopardy which suggests he has enough evidence to go to trial

But not enough to be sure of a conviction.

[Mr Gray]

You were referring to 'sceptics'' beliefs.  Your post:

and yet we repeatedly hear from sceptics that the McCanns havent been proven innocent..its absurd isnt it

Its hardly surprising a body of people suspect Mc's given their proximity to MM.

Has HCW stated he's concerned about double jeopardy or is that just media reporting?  If CB moves to the other prison will he still be under HCW's jurisdicition or will another prosecutor take over?  If CB hasn't been charged say by June will you accept its game over?

CB is being moved to a jail 15 minus from HCW.
Direct quote in German newspaper re jeopardy and something I raised a month ago
Depends what happens re questioning

[Mr Gray]

But not enough to be sure of a conviction.

That's right.. May be enough but no certainty.. He's in no rush. We should see some action once CB is moved

[Mr Gray]

That's mostly been pointed out in response to the absurd claim by their libel lawyer that they had been proved innocent.

Cite for the lawyers claim... No such claim.. You've made that up

[Eleanor]

Hi Holly

The lawyer is based in Kiel, so he will be a long way away when CB is moved. As he said, though, it's up to the prosecutor to prove guilt, not to the suspect to prove innocence. The time for Brueckner to decide whether to speak will be when (and if) he is interviewed. As to cooperating, I don't suppose many criminals do that unless it's to their advantage.

But surely they do have to enter a Plea, at least of Not Guilty.  And if they don't then it will be entered for them. 

After that it will be up to The Court to decide and their refusal to comment will go against them.

[Anthro]

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13391400/madeleine-mccann-cops-portugal-germany-christian-b/
The latest.

[Eleanor]

Not really no.  All the stats show when small children disappear/come to harm its usually at the hands of those connected with them.  Mc's by their own admission were the last known people to have contact with MM.  Conversely there's no evidence CB ever set eyes on MM.

"Usually" will not do.  Namely because it isn't Absolute.

[Eleanor]

That's mostly been pointed out in response to the absurd claim by their libel lawyer that they had been proved innocent.

This isn't True.

[Robittybob1]

Suspects do not have to prove innocence is the point.. Surely you understand that.

Then of course... You don't know what evidence there is against CB.
HCW says he's concerned re double jeopardy which suggests he has enough evidence to go to trial

If a person could show he was innocent that would stop the investigation into him, wouldn't it?  There would be much room for doubt they'd never prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person was guilty. 
If you are innocent and can prove it that could save a lot of grief IMO.

[Robittybob1]

Cite for the lawyers claim... No such claim.. You've made that up

Please provide the cite the claim G-unit "made that up". 

[Robittybob1]

"Usually" will not do.  Namely because it isn't Absolute.

Wasn't it 85% of the time.  Pretty much covered by the expression usually IMO.  Can you think of a better word?