Author Topic: So what actual searching was there?  (Read 411043 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #735 on: November 18, 2015, 02:32:38 PM »
Choose a time when there wasn't.
What time was that then?  And how did the searchers-cum-body-occulters know that the coast was completely clear? 

Offline pathfinder73

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #736 on: November 18, 2015, 02:51:23 PM »
What time was that then?  And how did the searchers-cum-body-occulters know that the coast was completely clear?

The best time was obviously when it was still dark and had gone quiet. Searches finished at 4am and most went home to get some sleep. 8am more searchers arrived to start their day so it's easy to find the best time to do it if that was your intention.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2015, 02:54:50 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #737 on: November 18, 2015, 03:11:04 PM »
The best time was obviously when it was still dark and had gone quiet. Searches finished at 4am and most went home to get some sleep. 8am more searchers arrived to start their day so it's easy to find the best time to do it if that was your intention.
So, there was no one out and about searching at all in PdL between 4am and 8am?  And the body occulters would have known this how, exactly?

Offline Lace

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #738 on: November 18, 2015, 03:43:47 PM »
Choose a time when there wasn't.

Where had they hidden the body in the time between the alert and hiding it?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #739 on: November 18, 2015, 03:46:41 PM »
Where had they hidden the body in the time between the alert and hiding it?

In that scenario a body was quickly hidden but better concealed later.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #740 on: November 18, 2015, 03:52:24 PM »
If they had they didn't look for her. Screaming and crying helps no-one.

absolutely true but a normal first reaction at the thought of maddie being abducted. they realised that to be of any us e they had to pull themselves together...hence the jogging etc

Offline Lace

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #741 on: November 18, 2015, 04:04:48 PM »
In that scenario a body was quickly hidden but better concealed later.

Quickly hidden where?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #742 on: November 18, 2015, 07:17:58 PM »
absolutely true but a normal first reaction at the thought of maddie being abducted. they realised that to be of any us e they had to pull themselves together...hence the jogging etc

What a load of cobblers.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #743 on: November 18, 2015, 07:18:55 PM »
What a load of cobblers.

you do have a way with words

Offline Anna

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #744 on: November 19, 2015, 12:26:47 PM »
Quickly hidden where?

Somewhere that the Police, dogs, searchers and locals(who knew the area) had not already searched, of course………………………
Very clever indeed, for folks who did not know the area, to do that………….Don’t you think?
And the wild dogs that were wandering around, didn’t find anything either.

“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #745 on: November 19, 2015, 01:23:31 PM »
absolutely true but a normal first reaction at the thought of maddie being abducted. they realised that to be of any us e they had to pull themselves together...hence the jogging etc

A normal reaction in your opinion. In my opinion a normal reaction by a parent to a missing child is to run, search and call the child's name.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #746 on: November 19, 2015, 01:37:30 PM »
A normal reaction in your opinion. In my opinion a normal reaction by a parent to a missing child is to run, search and call the child's name.
Which is what they did also.

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #747 on: November 19, 2015, 01:43:36 PM »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #748 on: November 19, 2015, 02:25:50 PM »

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #749 on: November 19, 2015, 02:41:29 PM »
yes it is.

A quick run around the tennis courts by Gerald. An hour the following morning. Anything else? With cites, of course.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0