« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 64 65 [66] 67 68 ... 161   Go Down

Author Topic: So what actual searching was there?  (Read 411509 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #975 on: November 21, 2015, 08:01:12 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on November 21, 2015, 07:59:51 PM
I think I just have !
Errr...no you didn't, unless you PM'ed it in a catty one-liner, as you like to do?
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #976 on: November 21, 2015, 08:06:37 PM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on November 21, 2015, 08:01:12 PM
Errr...no you didn't, unless you PM'ed it in a catty one-liner, as you like to do?

Nope you've lost me !
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #977 on: November 21, 2015, 08:10:13 PM »
Logged

Offline Anna

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #978 on: November 21, 2015, 08:12:37 PM »
OK. I will try asking, one last time, …………

Can you get back on and stay on the topic of the thread, please.

Thank you.
Logged
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #979 on: November 21, 2015, 09:16:27 PM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on November 21, 2015, 07:59:05 PM
Ooh, get you!  Do let us know what drops out after you've had a sit down, hope it's not too painful though!


I thought rational debate was the professed credo of McCann supporters?
I obviously misunderstood.

Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #980 on: November 21, 2015, 10:34:40 PM »
Quote from: Alice Purjorick on November 21, 2015, 09:16:27 PM

I thought rational debate was the professed credo of McCann supporters?
I obviously misunderstood.
I'm sorry for stooping to your level.
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #981 on: November 21, 2015, 10:49:20 PM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on November 21, 2015, 10:34:40 PM
I'm sorry for stooping to your level.

Psst Alfie ! Don't you think it's about time you changed your siggie ? I know not removing the moderated version was a bit of a face-saving exercise but it's all looking a little silly now.

Just a thought !
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #982 on: November 21, 2015, 11:05:27 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on November 21, 2015, 10:49:20 PM
Psst Alfie ! Don't you think it's about time you changed your siggie ? I know not removing the moderated version was a bit of a face-saving exercise but it's all looking a little silly now.

Just a thought !
don't you think it's time you changed yours?  Seeing as how when you click on the link it says "campaign not found"?   @)(++(*
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #983 on: November 21, 2015, 11:22:45 PM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on November 21, 2015, 11:05:27 PM
don't you think it's time you changed yours?  Seeing as how when you click on the link it says "campaign not found"?   @)(++(*
*&*%£
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #984 on: November 21, 2015, 11:34:43 PM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on November 21, 2015, 11:05:27 PM
don't you think it's time you changed yours?  Seeing as how when you click on the link it says "campaign not found"?   @)(++(*

Indeed Alfie. An oversight. Thanks for reminding me  ?{)(**
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #985 on: November 21, 2015, 11:47:20 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on November 21, 2015, 11:34:43 PM
Indeed Alfie. An oversight. Thanks for reminding me  ?{)(**
my absolute pleasure... ?>)()<
Logged

Offline pegasus

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #986 on: November 22, 2015, 01:15:47 AM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on November 21, 2015, 11:34:43 PM
Indeed Alfie. An oversight. Thanks for reminding me  ?{)(**
The big oversight in several cases (before and after the PDL case) was assuming the centre of the search area had been fully searched and so not bothering to fully search it.
Logged

Offline pathfinder73

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #987 on: November 22, 2015, 01:35:28 AM »
No in this case and every case is presuming people tell you the truth because they don't. Believing is for suckers. Truth is for seekers.
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #988 on: November 22, 2015, 06:41:50 AM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on November 21, 2015, 04:35:53 PM
You seem to forget that they have the correct timeline now which is much different. Kate left at 9:51 not 10pm.
I've no doubt this is buried somewhere deep in the bowels of the forum, but I could spend my entire life looking for it.

So where is - the correct timeline now - ?
Logged
What's up, old man?

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #989 on: November 22, 2015, 06:48:36 AM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on November 21, 2015, 05:53:43 PM
As none of the McCanns' friends was ever made an arguido, I think it's safe to assume that potential collusion had been ruled out by the investigating officers, and that corroborative testimony was taken from the restaurant staff which tallied more or less with their statements regarding the events at dinner that evening, or do you disagree?
Personally, I am seeing very little from the Tapas staff that supports the events of the week/night, to the extent that it makes me wonder what the Tapas staff were up to.  I did a comparison with the Millennium staff, and concluded that the Millennium staff seem to have more idea about the child minding arrangements than the Tapas staff.

I chalked this one off to the Tapas staff mainly keeping out of the firing line.
Logged
What's up, old man?
Pages: 1 ... 64 65 [66] 67 68 ... 161   Go Up
« previous next »