Author Topic: So what actual searching was there?  (Read 411064 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #990 on: November 22, 2015, 08:28:43 AM »
No in this case and every case is presuming people tell you the truth because they don't. Believing is for suckers. Truth is for seekers.

The whole point is knowing who is telling the truth.....it seems SY accept the McCanns are telling the truth

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #991 on: November 22, 2015, 08:31:48 AM »
The whole point is knowing who is telling the truth.....it seems SY accept the McCanns are telling the truth

Yet they changed their stories, and there is nothing to back it up, with any evidence to support abduction, that can't be explained by other scenarios.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #992 on: November 22, 2015, 08:40:29 AM »
Yet they changed their stories, and there is nothing to back it up, with any evidence to support abduction, that can't be explained by other scenarios.
Not suspects according to SY so despite everything you say Sy believe them...that's important..the fact that you don't is not important

Offline slartibartfast

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #993 on: November 22, 2015, 08:45:07 AM »
Not suspects according to SY so despite everything you say Sy believe them...that's important..the fact that you don't is not important

Bearing in mind this forum is to do with miscarriage of justice relying on the police as proof of guilt or innocence is a little strange.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #994 on: November 22, 2015, 08:45:55 AM »
Not suspects according to SY so despite everything you say Sy believe them...that's important..the fact that you don't is not important

SY have found nothing chasing abduction.

I wonder why ? &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #995 on: November 22, 2015, 08:48:20 AM »


Meanwhile, bearing in mind the topic title, the fragrant mccanns did b....r all searching.

They preferred others to clean up the mess they made.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #996 on: November 22, 2015, 08:49:02 AM »
Bearing in mind this forum is to do with miscarriage of justice relying on the police as proof of guilt or innocence is a little strange.

not strange at all if you understand statistics....so how often do the police get it wrong

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #997 on: November 22, 2015, 08:50:19 AM »

Meanwhile, bearing in mind the topic title, the fragrant mccanns did b....r all searching.

They preferred others to clean up the mess they made.

I think the searching has been discussed ...it is a matter of opinion

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #998 on: November 22, 2015, 08:51:59 AM »
Bearing in mind this forum is to do with miscarriage of justice relying on the police as proof of guilt or innocence is a little strange.

yet posters on here want to believe a policeman who has been found to be complicit in the torture of a suspect to extract a confession...very strange

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #999 on: November 22, 2015, 08:53:19 AM »
I think the searching has been discussed ...it is a matter of opinion

Not really.

The little they did is a matter of record.

They were too busy doing other things to look for Madeleine.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #1000 on: November 22, 2015, 08:55:38 AM »
Not really.

The little they did is a matter of record.

They were too busy doing other things to look for Madeleine.

so we have moved on from they didn't search...good...glad you have realised the truth

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #1001 on: November 22, 2015, 08:56:24 AM »
so we have moved on from they didn't search...good...glad you have realised the truth

You do recognize the words, b....r ALL ?

NOW REAL, LOVING PARENTS WOULD CONTINUE A SEARCH FOR A MISSING CHILD.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #1002 on: November 22, 2015, 08:57:37 AM »
You do recognize the words, b....r ALL ?

do you recognise the word "opinion"

Offline Lace

Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #1003 on: November 22, 2015, 09:04:53 AM »
You do recognize the words, b....r ALL ?

NOW REAL, LOVING PARENTS WOULD CONTINUE A SEARCH FOR A MISSING CHILD.

Come on then Stephen,  lets hear what YOU would have done on the evening of the 3rd of May if you had been in the McCann's shoes.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what actual searching was there?
« Reply #1004 on: November 22, 2015, 09:17:21 AM »
Come on then Stephen,  lets hear what YOU would have done on the evening of the 3rd of May if you had been in the McCann's shoes.

A mere reminder, that the crime is unknown, and I don't believe the mccanns tale of abduction.

To answer the question, I would be out searching. Wouldn't you ?