So what actual searching was there?

[mercury]

Your understanding is tainted for the reason you are on this forum.

To protect the mccanns.

You can say what you wish, but the facts are simple.

Madeleine was extensively searched for weeks, with no result.

No evidence supports abduction, which could not be explained by other possibilities.


Do you think by your repetition of the mccann abduction mantra ad nausea, people will believe you. other than your fellow believers ?

Then dream on.

 

Im all for honest opinions, never aggressive propaganda....

[Brietta]

Your understanding is tainted for the reason you are on this forum.

To protect the mccanns.

You can say what you wish, but the facts are simple.

Madeleine was extensively searched for weeks, with no result.

No evidence supports abduction, which could not be explained by other possibilities.


Do you think by your repetition of the mccann abduction mantra ad nausea, people will believe you. other than your fellow believers ?

Then dream on.

Please do not presume to know why I or any other poster have chosen to post on this forum.  It is none of your business.

However the fact it gives you some annoyance is enough to convince me I'm getting something right.

When did Mr Amaral's thesis take precedence over the search for a living child who it was still possible to find?

[mercury]

Please do not presume to know why I or any other poster have chosen to post on this forum.  It is none of your business.

However the fact it gives you some annoyance is enough to convince me I'm getting something right.

When did Mr Amaral's thesis take precedence over the search for a living child who it was still possible to find?

Maybe the Mccanns should have left it alone....instead of giving it publicity.....just think of all the money they would have to carry on tryng to find their , in your words as if its a fact "living child" instead of in their lawyers and PR employees pockets....stupid comes to mind

[stephen25000]

Please do not presume to know why I or any other poster have chosen to post on this forum.  It is none of your business.

However the fact it gives you some annoyance is enough to convince me I'm getting something right.

When did Mr Amaral's thesis take precedence over the search for a living child who it was still possible to find?

So you think I'm annoyed, how quaint.


However, I can see the blatant obvious.

[Brietta]

Maybe the Mccanns should have left it alone....instead of giving it publicity.....just think of all the money they would have to carry on tryng to find their , in your words as if its a fact "living child" instead of in their lawyers and PR employees pockets....stupid comes to mind

If I understood your post I would respond ... and since there is no mention of 'searching' it may very well be OT anyway.

Don't you ever get fed up with your McCann bashing? ... it certainly bores me.

[mercury]

If I understood your post I would respond ... and since there is no mention of 'searching' it may very well be OT anyway.

Don't you ever get fed up with your McCann bashing? ... it certainly bores me.

My post was a response to your THIRD paragraph....why you struggled to understand I have no idea

Mccann bashing? Youre having a laugh...I have given them plenty of leeway and acknowledge arguments for and against, quite disingenuous of you...perhaps I shouldnt be so kind and considerate in future!!
But I will not be dictated or emotionally blackmailed to by you or anyone else....its actually a human right, didnt you know?

[Alfred R Jones]

Wasn't Cliff Richard named by the press not the police ?

http://www.inbrief.co.uk/media-law/media-identification-of-suspects.htm

the police informed the media of the raid on his house in advance, if I recall correctly. 

[faithlilly]

the police informed the media of the raid on his house in advance, if I recall correctly.

For which they were reprimanded.

[Brietta]

My post was a response to your THIRD paragraph....why you struggled to understand I have no idea

Mccann bashing? Youre having a laugh...I have given them plenty of leeway and acknowledge arguments for and against, quite disingenuous of you...perhaps I shouldnt be so kind and considerate in future!!
But I will not be dictated or emotionally blackmailed to by you or anyone else....its actually a human right, didnt you know?

Oh ... is that what it was.
Little wonder I failed to make head nor tail of it then.

Nothing at all about whether the effect Mr Amaral's undeviating attention to his supposed death thesis for Madeleine McCann might have had the result of impinging on the search for her ... which was the question I posed in my post.

Your tiresome tirade about publicity ... money ... lawyers ... PR people ... says McCann bashing to me. 

It would be appropriate to remind you that others also enjoy the human rights to which you lay claim ... or do you think that is everyone but the Drs McCann and Madeleine who may very well have been denied the human right of being searched for as a living child because of the conviction of her death without a shred of evidence to support it.

[Alfred R Jones]

Perhaps other European countries have different rules on the naming of suspects ?

You claimed that Redwood would not even have been allowed to answer "no comment" to the question of the McCanns' status without it jeopardizing some future (mythical) conviction.  What has that got to do with rules for naiming suspects in other european countries?

Did you actually hear any interviewer pose the question of the McCanns' status anyway?  If so what was the actual question?  How was it phrased and who asked it? 

[slartibartfast]

Oh ... is that what it was.
Little wonder I failed to make head nor tail of it then.

Nothing at all about whether the effect Mr Amaral's undeviating attention to his supposed death thesis for Madeleine McCann might have had the result of impinging on the search for her ... which was the question I posed in my post.

Your tiresome tirade about publicity ... money ... lawyers ... PR people ... says McCann bashing to me. 

It would be appropriate to remind you that others also enjoy the human rights to which you lay claim ... or do you think that is everyone but the Drs McCann and Madeleine who may very well have been denied the human right of being searched for as a living child because of the conviction of her death without a shred of evidence to support it.

And there as me thinking that the recent court case had decided GA's book and hence the theories contained within had not impacted on the search.

[faithlilly]

You claimed that Redwood would not even have been allowed to answer "no comment" to the question of the McCanns' status without it jeopardizing some future (mythical) conviction.  What has that got to do with rules for naiming suspects in other european countries?

Did you actually hear any interviewer pose the question of the McCanns' status anyway?  If so what was the actual question?  How was it phrased and who asked it?

You haven't commented on my link about the naming of suspects before they are arrested or charged.

[Alfred R Jones]

You haven't commented on my link about the naming of suspects before they are arrested or charged.

because I didn't read it, but perhaps someone in Portugal should have read it before they made the McCanns and Murat their chief suspects, eh?

[Alfred R Jones]

You haven't commented on my link about the naming of suspects before they are arrested or charged.

and you have avoided answering my questions.

[Alfred R Jones]

You haven't commented on my link about the naming of suspects before they are arrested or charged.

having now skimmed the article in your link it seems to be advice for media outlets to avoid being sued for libel, not about the risk to future convictions secured by the judiciary by the police naming of a suspect prior to arrest, as you have stated.