Sceptics beliefs ?

[Robittybob1]

do you understand the statements made by grime and harrison...have you read them
do you understand what no evidential reliablility or value means...do you undersatnd...as no remains were found the only alerts that can become  corroborated are the CSI dogs...

based on those statements from the number one expert...how can anyone regard the alerts as any type of evidence

You seem to be missing witness testimony.

[Mr Gray]

You seem to be missing witness testimony.

Im missing nothing...what witness

[Robittybob1]

the dogs scored 95% on the contamination carpet tiles test...you obviously understand how awful a cadaver smells


I reckon if you put 5 pieces of cloth that had been wiped on a cadavr and 5 taht hadnt....I could do as good as the dogs

What about "5 pieces of cloth that had been wiped on a cadavr and 5 taht hadnt" and put them all through a washing machine and then test them?

[Erngath]

The whole point of black humour is to make jokes about taboo subjects.

Yes, I appreciate that!
But surely not a missing little girl?

[Robittybob1]

Im missing nothing...what witness

Potential witness testimony , i.e. if someone confesses.

[Mr Gray]

What about "5 pieces of cloth that had been wiped on a cadavr and 5 taht hadnt" and put them all through a washing machine and then test them?

is that what grime did in his test...  id have to try it......it doesnt matter what you say...grime as a witness...and Harrison are clear...no evidential relaibility or value

[Mr Gray]

Potential witness testimony , i.e. if someone confesses.

im considering the evidence we have..you are speculating....im talking about evidence

[Robittybob1]

is that what grime did in his test...  id have to try it......it doesnt matter what you say...grime as a witness...and Harrison are clear...no evidential relaibility or value

I have my doubts that you could match a cadaver dog in reliability. 

[Mr Gray]

I have my doubts that you could match a cadaver dog in reliability.

I dont

[Robittybob1]

I dont

Well we will test it sometime.

[Mr Gray]

Well we will test it sometime.

test what ....I said i didnt have any doubt....not that i was as reliable as the dogs...i have no doubt im not as relaible as the dogs....the point i am making is taht the dogs are tested on very simple tests...on those tests...fresh cadaver....I may well be quite reliable

[Robittybob1]

test what ....I said i didnt have any doubt....not that i was as reliable as the dogs...i have no doubt im not as relaible as the dogs....the point i am making is taht the dogs are tested on very simple tests...on those tests...fresh cadaver....I may well be quite reliable

wellwe will get a dead piglet and test your ability to find which carpet square were in contact.  See if you can do better than 75% correct.

[Mr Gray]

wellwe will get a dead piglet and test your ability to find which carpet square were in contact.  See if you can do better than 75% correct.

nope....we need a cadaver ...dead for at least acouple of hours and starting to stink..... adead piglet would only test my ability to detect....a dead piglet...sorry Rob but my background is in science

[Venturi Swirl]

It wasn't about Madeleine, it was about her parents.

If you enjoy black humour about the parents of a missing child, then why not about the child herself?

[Wonderfulspam]

I've only just caught up with this thread. I notice my joke caused some upset.

It wasn't about Madeleine, it was about her parents.

Indeed it was, the crux of the joke being, there is little positive to say about them IMO.

It may not be to everyone's taste, but it made me laugh & that's all that matters.