Author Topic: Joint Enterprise Law  (Read 35686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

peteats

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #75 on: June 15, 2012, 08:56:14 PM »
 @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

Trolley dash

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #76 on: June 15, 2012, 08:57:10 PM »
He will now be an emotional wreck at the "wounded soldier act" having been exposed.No choice other than to snipe whilst looking to recruit likeminded trolls to back him up.

You know him too well Realtruth  8(0(*

realtruth

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #77 on: June 15, 2012, 09:06:51 PM »
Heard he even got financial rewards for returning dogs to their rightful owners  8-)(--) Act of human decency but how many dogs can you find? 8)-)))

Question

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #78 on: June 15, 2012, 09:09:37 PM »

You seem jealous. Is this cause you cant be a Craigies Angel ?? Warrington, Bermondsey, Ipswich and Surrey can always apply

ginger nuts lol

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #79 on: June 15, 2012, 09:10:48 PM »
Heard he even got financial rewards for returning dogs to their rightful owners  8-)(--) Act of human decency but how many dogs can you find? 8)-)))

What a martyr...  8@??)(  8@??)(  8@??)(  8@??)(  8@??)(  8@??)(   8@??)(

realtruth

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #80 on: June 15, 2012, 09:18:53 PM »
You seem jealous. Is this cause you cant be a Craigies Angel ?? Warrington, Bermondsey, Ipswich and Surrey can always apply  Oh thank the Lord that excludes me  8((()*/

Question 2 U

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #81 on: June 15, 2012, 09:21:54 PM »

You seem jealous. Is this cause you cant be a Craigies Angel ?? Warrington, Bermondsey, Ipswich and Surrey can always apply

Do you give all your victims a name? What name did you give Mr Rothwell (RIP)

peteats

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #82 on: June 15, 2012, 09:34:41 PM »
To be perfectly honest i wouldnt want to be an Angel  8(8-)). But the sooner you answer the questions Kevin, the sooner we can move on. Your response would be most intresting now we have documentation you have been unable to censor.

realtruth

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #83 on: June 15, 2012, 09:41:40 PM »
Answers please Kevin now that you have achieved exposure to your own MOJ  8-)(--)

Craigies Angel

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #84 on: June 15, 2012, 09:49:16 PM »

Why would our Kevin want to get associated with what is clearly a hate sight ? You might just be able to engage in adult discussion once we have a professional site in operation.

Craigies Angel

peteats

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #85 on: June 15, 2012, 09:50:47 PM »
Please KEVIN tell us your story as it happened as from the documentation now available it seems you were convicted in accordance with the law. I am most intrested in hearing how you intend to portray yourself as a MOJ. You were there, you were in the house, you touched the body while it was still alive. You stole the car.

Please do explain Kevin. Rest in Peace Mr Rothwell.  (Architect)

peteats

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #86 on: June 15, 2012, 09:53:08 PM »

Why would our Kevin want to get associated with what is clearly a hate sight ? You might just be able to engage in adult discussion once we have a professional site in operation.

Craigies Angel


We have a good forum here, we exposed our Kev  8@??)(.

AgentA

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #87 on: June 15, 2012, 10:10:01 PM »
interesting page 4 of this statement....it was marks turn this time

[attachment deleted by admin]

AgentA

  • Guest
Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #88 on: June 15, 2012, 10:12:16 PM »
so how many times had you done this Kevin??? was that how you survived ? robbing defenceless, vulnerable people ? NOTHING CHANGED THEN?

Offline John

Re: Joint Enterprise Law
« Reply #89 on: June 15, 2012, 10:13:36 PM »

Why would our Kevin want to get associated with what is clearly a hate sight ? You might just be able to engage in adult discussion once we have a professional site in operation.

Craigies Angel

Kevin, you might perceive this to be a hate site if you are indeed guilty of the charge.  You obviously aren't able to answer the questions and this will undoubtedly be clear by anyone reading this.

We have given you several opportunities to put your case but you constantly fail to do so Kevin.  You apparently have a history of avoiding the most difficult questions.

As you seem to want to mark my observations tonight using the pseudonym 'Sherlock' then lets see if you can respond to these observations.


According to your pal Mark Fuller, you were the leader of the gang sort of speak and he claims that he was scared of you?  He also states that you and him were on the rob and had apparently robbed other men on other occasions.  Fuller says he was surprised that you gave a statement to police and was basically calling you a 'grass'

What do you have to say about that Kev?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.