Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views

[justsaying]

How about you start using your head!

Do I really need to remind you where [Name removed]'s body lay that night and under what circumstances?

Oh please, I am answering your question's which is probably why I seem to be focussed on you. And that still does not mean anything, if his DNA was found they would have used it regardless how long or what conditions Jodi's body lay in that night.

[jixy]

justsaying you have made some very good, clear points. Luke's case needs to be highlighted in the correct way.

There will always be people out there who can argue til the end of time, just because they can

Have you followed his case for a long time?

[justsaying]

And, in all fairness, we still have not seen a source that suggests there was a partial DNA match, so it is safe to assume there is not one, especially considering the CPS failed to use any such thing during the trial.

[justsaying]

justsaying you have made some very good, clear points. Luke's case needs to be highlighted in the correct way.

There will always be people out there who can argue til the end of time, just because they can

Have you followed his case for a long time?

Yes, very much like Baz, read a lot on it a few years ago. His conviction is questionable to say the least, especially through the lack of DNA evidence, lack being none! 

[jixy]

Yes the lack of DNA is very important!

I have followed it for quite a few years too but both you and Baz seem to have a good take on it

[justsaying]

Yes the lack of DNA is very important!

I have followed it for quite a few years too but both you and Baz seem to have a good take on it

I will admit I cannot remember every single thing I have read on Luke's case, there has been quite a bit of information over the years - Baz has certainly reminded me of a few things.

[jixy]

its good to recap on the details especially for people who dont know much about the case. Hopefully as work on his case progresses more and more will be made clear. The support for Luke is still growing and that is fantastic

[justsaying]

Slightly off topic, but regarding the DNA evidence which was apparently not used because of the conditions the body lay in... it made me think of the Suffolk stranglers victims, their bodies lay in pretty much the same, if not worse conditions, yet they still used DNA evidence to convict.... Just saying...

[Nicholas]

How will new DNA techniques help Luke Mitchell over turn his conviction?

[Nicholas]

its good to recap on the details especially for people who dont know much about the case. Hopefully as work on his case progresses more and more will be made clear. The support for Luke is still growing and that is fantastic

No it isn't!

[jixy]

Nothing about Luke's case is laughable. Would be one sick person to find humour  in a 14 year old boys life being ruined.

[Nicholas]

Slightly off topic, but regarding the DNA evidence which was apparently not used because of the conditions the body lay in... it made me think of the Suffolk stranglers victims, their bodies lay in pretty much the same, if not worse conditions, yet they still used DNA evidence to convict.... Just saying...

What about the fibre evidence then?

[jixy]

No its not fantastic that support is growing ? or it isnt growing . WRONG!

[justsaying]

No it isn't!

I think the discussions on certain social media suggests otherwise. You may not support him, but others certainly do.

[Nicholas]

justsaying you have made some very good, clear points. Dont be put off by name calling. Luke's case needs to be highlighted in the correct way.

There will always be people out there who can argue til the end of time, just because they can

Have you followed his case for a long time?

So you think Luke Mitchell talking to an intern at the Scottish Herald is the "correct way?"

Did you see how he referred to [Name removed] as "my Jodi?"