UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Jeremy Bamber case document library => Jeremy Bamber case documents library. => Jeremy Bamber's letters => Topic started by: Admin on March 17, 2012, 10:04:32 PM
-
Letter to Mike Teskowski dated 4th July 2010
-
When someone writes totally in capital letters it's because they don't want who they truly are to be seen. They may well be totally unaware that that is why they are doing it, but that doesn't change the fact that it is!
-
The least possible is revealed from writing in all capitals. Printing shows less than script, but when all the writing is in capitals, it hides even more.
Most handwritten ransom notes, for example, are written in all capitals!
You can get something from it however. For example, the slant will still tell you the emotional make up of the writer (the farther to the right, the more the emotional expression), and the heaviness of the writing will still tell you how deeply emotions affect this writer.
There are a few other indications that will still show through in all capital writing, however, the main thing to think about is that this person, knowingly or unknowlingly, is hiding themselves away. The question is "why?"
-
Well, he is in prison.
Emotions run high and are best kept contained if anyone is to survive such incarceration.
Maybe not so much hiding - but protecting oneself.
If he is innocent, hasn't he been hurt enough....?
We all have a defense mechanism that automatically sets itself in place after trauma, could this not be just that?
-
Right slant indicates a response to communication, but not how it takes place. For example, the writer may wish to be friendly, manipulative, responsive, intrusive, to sell, to control, to be loving, supportive, just to name some possibilities.
If the handwriting is generally upright, this indicates independence.
A left slant tendency shows emotion and reserve. This writer needs to be true to self first and foremost and can be resentful if others try to push for more commitment from them.
-
Well, he is in prison.
Emotions run high and are best kept contained if anyone is to survive such incarceration.
he has a right slant not left one
Maybe not so much hiding - but protecting oneself.
again right slant
If he is innocent, hasn't he been hurt enough....?
We all have a defense mechanism that automatically sets itself in place after trauma, could this not be just that?
wouldnt openess reflect innocence
-
Hallo, Mr Brown. I'm finding your posts really interesting - I've mentioned it on here before, I went to a talk about handwriting once and it was fascinating. I took along a letter I had from a relative who is in prison for a very serious crime, and got a VERY interesting analysis!! I hope you post somemore. x.
-
You present yourself as someone who seems to know what they are talking about.....and most certainly seem to be of the opinion Bamber is guilty.
Oh, I just found what you seem to have written online....almost word for word.
Why did you not just say you copied it Mr Brown.
Why are you hiding more to the point.
-
This is where you got your info from Mr Brown isn't it?
http://handwritinganalysis-1.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/when-people-write-in-all-capitals.html
-
This is where you got your info from Mr Brown isn't it?
http://handwritinganalysis-1.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/when-people-write-in-all-capitals.html
Oh. 8(8-)) This is my disappointed face.
-
Oh Shona......you were taken in!
8(8-))
-
Good spot FTA - and for the record I think hand writing analysis is quackery.
-
Oh Shona......you were taken in!
8(8-))
Hmm. More than you'd know!!
-
This is where you got your info from Mr Brown isn't it?
http://handwritinganalysis-1.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/when-people-write-in-all-capitals.html
that is correct. and most interesting it is. i wonder how bamber writes to others or whether his writing is the same across the board. rather disturbing wouldnt you agree
-
This is where you got your info from Mr Brown isn't it?
http://handwritinganalysis-1.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/when-people-write-in-all-capitals.html
that is correct. and most interesting it is. i wonder how bamber writes to others or whether his writing is the same across the board. rather disturbing wouldnt you agree
he comes across as quite poor in the use of the english language but maybe that is down to his environment for 26 years.
-
This is where you got your info from Mr Brown isn't it?
http://handwritinganalysis-1.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/when-people-write-in-all-capitals.html
that is correct. and most interesting it is. i wonder how bamber writes to others or whether his writing is the same across the board. rather disturbing wouldnt you agree
So, having read the analysis.....what's your view on Bamber?
I've seen someone else post a letter they received from him and the writing is almost identical, therefore, we presume that he writes to all his friends in capitals.
With this in mind.......your views would be most welcome.
-
Yes, plus his letters are vetted so I guess that would prevent him sending anything personal or emotional - which probably makes them seem a little erm .. stunted, is that the right word?
-
Yes, plus his letters are vetted so I guess that would prevent him sending anything personal or emotional - which probably makes them seem a little erm .. stunted, is that the right word?
I think that early letter he sent to Colin was quite revealing, though. His true colours.
-
I do believe there is very little he cannot say.
His posts to Mike go into great detail about the evidence etc....even stating his request to have the family arrested.
What is censored more is the mail he receives, rather than that being sent out.
-
Yes sorry, 'prevented' was the wrong word. I meant more that it would put him off - but as you've said it doesn't seem to anyway.
-
Yes sorry, 'prevented' was the wrong word. I meant more that it would put him off - but as you've said it doesn't seem to anyway.
Oh dear, I'm getting all confuzzled now and properly mixing up threads (I'm a bit b....red, I've been re-seeding a field today BY HAND like a serf) - is it right that Mike is now saying that Sheila didn't shoot anyone? Who is he saying it was? Answers please, on a post card......
-
Um.. I'm probably not the right person to answer this as I don't follow his theories that closely, but I think his current suggestion is that NB / JB did not say "Sheila's got the gun" but "She has got the gun.." allowing for it to be June or any other female assassin of his choosing I suppose.
-
I do believe there is very little he cannot say.
His posts to Mike go into great detail about the evidence etc....even stating his request to have the family arrested.
What is censored more is the mail he receives, rather than that being sent out.
From what I have learnt from supporters, his mail (going in and out) is censored.
Yes, he will be forbidden to receive certain things given his Cat A status.
Hi ya FTA... Are the prison allowed to censor mail going in? Do you mean they read it or do they actually not let him have certain things?
I think a certain pertentage of mail is written, goin in and coming out. Normally in an A-cat prison all mail is read, apart from what falls under rule 39.
-
Um.. I'm probably not the right person to answer this as I don't follow his theories that closely, but I think his current suggestion is that NB / JB did not say "Sheila's got the gun" but "She has got the gun.." allowing for it to be June or any other female assassin of his choosing I suppose.
I agree Weety, that is what he is suggesting.....that the phone call did not say it was Sheila, therefore, it could have been June who had the gun.
How did Sheila get the two shots if this be the case?
-
And how did she end up with the gun across her?
-
Um.. I'm probably not the right person to answer this as I don't follow his theories that closely, but I think his current suggestion is that NB / JB did not say "Sheila's got the gun" but "She has got the gun.." allowing for it to be June or any other female assassin of his choosing I suppose.
Oh, right. So, currently in the frame, June, Lara Croft, and Olive from On The Buses. Oh dear. Did he and Jackie both lose it on the same day?
-
Sorry FTA - I had to modify my previous post as I made a few mistakes.
I think someone should check with regards censoring mail going in and certain things not being allowed in.
I haven't heard of this before? I know mail goes missing, in and out but I don't believe the prison are allowed to stop anyone from receiving mail? ..... think it comes under the human rights act......
I'm not saying they are refused it Weety, sorry for not making that clearer, what I meant is, it's blacked out.
For example, if you gave an address to the inmate, and the censors felt it was not appropriate that you should have that address ( for reprisals or anything else), then the letter would be intact, but the address would be blacked out completely.
Does that make sense?
Things Bamber cannot have, photo's of children. His crime involved children therefore, his receipt of things regarding children are very limited.
-
Um.. I'm probably not the right person to answer this as I don't follow his theories that closely, but I think his current suggestion is that NB / JB did not say "Sheila's got the gun" but "She has got the gun.." allowing for it to be June or any other female assassin of his choosing I suppose.
Oh, right. So, currently in the frame, June, Lara Croft, and Olive from On The Buses. Oh dear. Did he and Jackie both lose it on the same day?
I am surprised the poor murdered twins haven't been blamed! Thank's for posting that letter ... I had never read a multiple murderers writing before.
-
Does Admin have the letter from June 2011, in which JB goes nuts over Ali Bongo?
-
Does Admin have the letter from June 2011, in which JB goes nuts over Ali Bongo?
WTF is 'Ali Bongo' Weety .... I know it's some bullsh*t from Tesko but it was before my time? Obviously it upset Bamber?
-
Does Admin have the letter from June 2011, in which JB goes nuts over Ali Bongo?
WTF is 'Ali Bongo' Weety .... I know it's some bullsh*t from Tesko but it was before my time? Obviously it upset Bamber?
Andrea and Shona could tell you better than I could, but Mike made up some story about a medium who was going to tell us all who did it or something. Yes, it upset JB, and then Mike revealed it was all a hoax anyway.
-
Um.. I'm probably not the right person to answer this as I don't follow his theories that closely, but I think his current suggestion is that NB / JB did not say "Sheila's got the gun" but "She has got the gun.." allowing for it to be June or any other female assassin of his choosing I suppose.
Oh, right. So, currently in the frame, June, Lara Croft, and Olive from On The Buses. Oh dear. Did he and Jackie both lose it on the same day?
LOL..........Yes! I remember Olive............ohhhhhhh Arrrfer!! @)(++(*
-
Do you remember the episode where they had been decorating? olive needed the loo in the middle of the night and the paint was still wet! Handprints all over.
And old Blakey, bless him. @)(++(*
-
Do you remember the episode where they had been decorating? olive needed the loo in the middle of the night and the paint was still wet! Handprints all over.
And old Blakey, bless him. @)(++(*
LOL.........yes I remember that episode! .........Olive what have you done! You stoopid great lump!
Brilliant stuff. Sadly, they dont make them like that anymore.
I liked Blakey.........argggggg.............I ate you Butler! @)(++(*
-
Letter to Mike Teskowski dated 4th July 2010
IMO Bamber reveals so much in his letters