You are confusing those present with those responsible for torture.
Before the bag was placed over her head, she'd have known who was present.
After the bag was placed over her head, she'd have had no clue who delivered the blows
...
she said amaral was there, egging them on, it was proven he was not there at the time ,that makes her a liar, im sure judges knew what they were doing, and all her appeals quashed, time and time again, there is, after all this, no evidence police beat her over her inmates after her confession in the presence of her lawyer, the daybefore she alledges she was by police, perhaps it leaked out, incidentally, what this has to do with the mccann case is beyond me as theynever were tortured or ever going to be
>@@(*&)
And dont forget she is convicted of perjury as well as murder, do go on supporting her though if it bolsters your anti amaral agenda, and also i see from you and your ilk you are so keen to cherrypick, a single conviction based on a technicality makes mr amaral a CONVICTED CRIMINAL and they were right but multiple decisions by the courts on LC being a murderer and a perjurer, means thry are wrong and she must be INNOCENT, barf