Surely you are aware of the quotes. As I said only parts of the actual original quote are still available on the internet.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7864.msg373004#msg373004
"Do you accept that she made the statements recorded in this article? http://www.infobae.com/2007/08/15/331952-crecen-las-sospechas-contra-los-padres-madeleine/
In particular:
1. "The technical director of the Ocean Club resort, Silvia Batista, stated that the same night that Madeleine disappeared, she personally offered the childcare service "because the hotel is responsible for the children of the clients, but they Rejected ".
2. "According to the director of the housing, " every month have theft records in place, so a nanny service are advised " but even knowing this, Maddie's parents did not accept it "
3. "We were not to blame for the disappearance of the child, I could not say whose fault it was, but it was not ours," said the director, noting that "the parents of the girl that night were very careless", and that is why they didn't ask for the babysitting service."
In 3 there are clear hints of a conflict of interest. She is basically declaring that she and the OC are not guilty, like responsible for Madeleine's disappearance. Then she goes on to say something like it wouldn't have happened had the parents not refused the babysitting service.
Is Silvia involved in providing the nanny service? If she personally offered it earlier that day it sounds like she had some involvement in providing the service.
These issues are not raised in her statement yet seem very important to the case. Why were they not raised with the PJ in her statement?"
1. "The technical director of the Ocean Club resort, Silvia Batista, stated that the same night that Madeleine disappeared, she personally offered the childcare service "because the hotel is responsible for the children of the clients, but they Rejected ".
I have googled that and have not received a hit from any of silvia Batista's PJ statements or of any worthwhile provenance. I have found it mentioned in blogs inimically hostile to the McCann family.
In my opinion it is a falsehood and just one of many put about at the time of Madeleine's disappearance and since and as such is not worthy of mention on a forum such as this.
Am I wrong in thinking this?