Charlotte Pennington - what is the truth?

[Brietta]

It is what was quoted in Rob’s cite...

At risk of appearing obtuse ... Rob makes quite a few posts ... would it be possible for you to indicate to which one you refer?

[Robittybob1]

At risk of appearing obtuse ... Rob makes quite a few posts ... would it be possible for you to indicate to which one you refer?

I believe it was this one http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10342.msg499710#msg499710

[Brietta]

I believe it was this one http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10342.msg499710#msg499710

Thank you Rob.

[Robittybob1]

In my study on the McCann case I have found I couldn't rule out the possibility that someone else was aware that Madeleine had wandered out of the apartment prior to Kate's check.
There was the reports from Stephen Carpenter that his wife had mentioned someone calling "Madeleine" and this seems to be prior to 22.00.

If this person began looking for Madeleine prior to Kate's check then the lady, picking up her child from the night creche spoke to a man who was a Mark Warner guest, could have been informed about Maddie , Abby or Gabby, prior to Kate's check also.  This scenario allows the three night creche workers to start heading toward the McCann apartment possibly at a time while Kate is still doing her check.
This scenario allows Amy to be in the apartment early enough to see the window open and shutter up, and for Charlotte to say she was in the apartment within 5 minutes of Madeleine being found missing by Kate.

The concept that some other Mark Warner guest was aware of Madeleine going missing prior to Kate's check needs investigating.

[G-Unit]

In my study on the McCann case I have found I couldn't rule out the possibility that someone else was aware that Madeleine had wandered out of the apartment prior to Kate's check.
There was the reports from Stephen Carpenter that his wife had mentioned someone calling "Madeleine" and this seems to be prior to 22.00.

If this person began looking for Madeleine prior to Kate's check then the lady, picking up her child from the night creche spoke to a man who was a Mark Warner guest, could have been informed about Maddie , Abby or Gabby, prior to Kate's check also.  This scenario allows the three night creche workers to start heading toward the McCann apartment possibly at a time while Kate is still doing her check.
This scenario allows Amy to be in the apartment early enough to see the window open and shutter up, and for Charlotte to say she was in the apartment within 5 minutes of Madeleine being found missing by Kate.

The concept that some other Mark Warner guest was aware of Madeleine going missing prior to Kate's check needs investigating.

As does the 10 pm checking time.

[Venturi Swirl]

What about suggesting Charlotte Pennington is an attention seeking clown who makes things up - is that libel too?

What should one infer from the deafening silence greeting my post above?

[Robittybob1]

What should one infer from the deafening silence greeting my post above?

Pass.

[Venturi Swirl]

Pass.

LOL.  I guess it’s ok then to libel Ms Pennington.  As you were...

[Sunny]

LOL.  I guess it’s ok then to libel Ms Pennington.  As you were...

Perhaps you should stop trying to goad others into making views on Charlotte Pennington, beyond those that have already been made VS.

[Venturi Swirl]

Perhaps you should stop trying to goad others into making views on Charlotte Pennington, beyond those that have already been made VS.

My remark was tongue in cheek as I sure you know, and refers to comments already made on this thread which are IMO libellous but which have been allowed to remain, whilst anythhing remotely off colour said about St Amaral, St Grime or the Righteous Dogs, or in this case “the manager”, is given a rebuke for being libel.  Do you have a problem with me exercising my freedom of speech in pointing this out? 

[slartibartfast]

My remark was tongue in cheek as I sure you know, and refers to comments already made on this thread which are IMO libellous but which have been allowed to remain, whilst anythhing remotely off colour said about St Amaral, St Grime or the Righteous Dogs, or in this case “the manager”, is given a rebuke for being libel.  Do you have a problem with me exercising my freedom of speech in pointing this out?

Everyone else appears to be discussing discrepancies in statements which casts doubt on her evidence which isn’t libellous. As opposed to bald statements, sometimes unexplained, made with no supporting information which can be.

[Brietta]

Everyone else appears to be discussing discrepancies in statements which casts doubt on her evidence which isn’t libellous. As opposed to bald statements, sometimes unexplained, made with no supporting information which can be.

Who set up posters on a discussion forum to be prosecution, judge and jury on "discrepancies in statements which casts doubt on her evidence"?

In my opinion "casting doubt" on statements made by a witness is tantamount to questioning their veracity and therefore the integrity of the person making the statements; if that is not defamation ... exactly what is?

[Eleanor]

Does any of this matter?  Charlotte Pennington wasn't involved in the Abduction of Madeleine McCann.

Or does anyone think she was?

[Venturi Swirl]

Does any of this matter?  Charlotte Pennington wasn't involved in the Abduction of Madeleine McCann.

Or does anyone think she was?

Her testimony has to be rubbished, she’s on the McCanns side.

[jassi]

I didn't know Robi was a sceptic.