Author Topic: Amaral and the dogs  (Read 835684 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #150 on: May 13, 2015, 11:24:53 PM »
Yeah the sex tissue had blood on it. Eddie alerts to blood.

you are a classic example of how people have been duped by amaral...

Offline Eleanor

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #151 on: May 13, 2015, 11:40:10 PM »
Yeah the sex tissue had blood on it. Eddie alerts to blood.

Well that's a new one I must say.  But at least you are admitting that Eddie alerted to blood.

PS.  Where was Keela, by the way?

Not that any of this explains why Amaral made such a mess of it all.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #152 on: May 14, 2015, 01:08:20 AM »
you are a classic example of how people have been duped by amaral...

My own thoughts have nothing to do with Amaral. Eddie alerted to cadaver scent in the Prout case when there was no proof. Grime knows Eddie and has given his own professional opinion. Prout was convicted on circumstantial evidence. He later confessed but denied it for years and many believed him.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #153 on: May 14, 2015, 02:20:42 AM »
In an experiment, a scent pad was contacted with a subject at post mortem interval (PMI) 1hr 10mins, and later when the pad was sniffed by 5 EVRD dogs, NONE of the 5 dogs alerted.

When a pad was sampled at PMI = 1hr 25mins and later sniffed by the 5 dogs, one of the dogs alerted, so that is the minimum according to that experiment.

Of all of Eddie's many successful cases, can anyone post a case where a PMI proven to be as short as only 45mins (like proposed in the book) produced an alert?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #154 on: May 14, 2015, 07:35:07 AM »
My own thoughts have nothing to do with Amaral. Eddie alerted to cadaver scent in the Prout case when there was no proof. Grime knows Eddie and has given his own professional opinion. Prout was convicted on circumstantial evidence. He later confessed but denied it for years and many believed him.


the fact is that both Grime and Harrison say the alerts are not confirmed...fact...yet amaral takes the alerts as proof....he is wrong to do that...thereis no evidence that Maddie died in the apartment yet amaral claims he can prove it...he is a fantasist

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #155 on: May 14, 2015, 07:57:21 AM »

the fact is that both Grime and Harrison say the alerts are not confirmed...fact...yet amaral takes the alerts as proof....he is wrong to do that...thereis no evidence that Maddie died in the apartment yet amaral claims he can prove it...he is a fantasist

No dave it remains a possibility.

As to abduction. no evidence at all, unless you are a complete fantasist yourself.


ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #156 on: May 14, 2015, 08:00:48 AM »

the fact is that both Grime and Harrison say the alerts are not confirmed...fact...yet amaral takes the alerts as proof....he is wrong to do that...thereis no evidence that Maddie died in the apartment yet amaral claims he can prove it...he is a fantasist

And yet he believes he can win the libel trial ...

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #157 on: May 14, 2015, 08:02:11 AM »
And yet he believes he can win the libel trial ...

Wait for round two.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #158 on: May 14, 2015, 08:06:02 AM »
Yeah the sex tissue had blood on it. Eddie alerts to blood.
Yes he does.  So, asking again, why did he alert to a tissue in a windy old gun placement in Jersey and not alert to traces of blood that must surely have been present in all (or at least some) of the apartments he checked out?


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #159 on: May 14, 2015, 08:14:08 AM »
Wait for round two.
if there is around two.....the court has to allow the appeal first

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #160 on: May 14, 2015, 08:30:55 AM »
if there is around two.....the court has to allow the appeal first

That will not be a problem.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2015, 08:59:11 AM by stephen25000 »

Offline Montclair

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #161 on: May 14, 2015, 08:54:15 AM »
The dog alerts were confirmed and Gonçalo Amaral did not misinterpret the DNA results. The first reports given to the PJ from the laboratory and the UK police indicated a match to Madeleine, then with the bombshell final report, John Lowe somehow mixes in 37 markers instead of the 19 and all of a sudden they don't know who the fluids belong to! Very strange or not so strange at all.

Offline Montclair

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #162 on: May 14, 2015, 08:55:36 AM »
if there is around two.....the court has to allow the appeal first

Don't worry, the appeal will take place, it is an automatic right.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #163 on: May 14, 2015, 08:59:56 AM »
Don't worry, the appeal will take place, it is an automatic right.

No it isn't an automatic right.

The appellants must cite grounds of appeal that will be considered and either granted or rejected.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #164 on: May 14, 2015, 09:06:28 AM »

No it isn't an automatic right.

The appellants must cite grounds of appeal that will be considered and either granted or rejected.
#=

Wait and see ferryman. 8((()*/