Author Topic: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views  (Read 210663 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

jixy

  • Guest
Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #645 on: November 08, 2018, 06:01:49 PM »
just when you think it couldnt get any worse. Nothing from Luke though

Offline justsaying

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #646 on: November 08, 2018, 06:03:23 PM »
just when you think it couldnt get any worse. Nothing from Luke though

No because luckily for him the rain washed it all away and somehow managed to leave others behind, which was picked up from the wooded area  @)(++(*

jixy

  • Guest
Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #647 on: November 08, 2018, 06:04:28 PM »
No because luckily for him the rain washed it all away and somehow managed to leave others behind, which was picked up from the wooded area  @)(++(*

I just said the very same thing to myself  @)(++(*

Offline John

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #648 on: November 08, 2018, 06:23:46 PM »
The subject is Luke Mitchell. Please note that anything else will be deleted on sight.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #649 on: November 08, 2018, 08:45:40 PM »
No because luckily for him the rain washed it all away and somehow managed to leave others behind, which was picked up from the wooded area  @)(++(*

In your mind maybe - a sperm stain on the sleeve of the t-shirt was innocently transferred from the wooded area? Oh please!

Keep trying!

"....complete DNA profiles can be obtained from laundered semen stains on school uniform-type clothing (T-shirts, trousers, tights, socks) with an eight-month lag time between semen deposition and laundering, despite multiple washes

https://www.bioportfolio.com/resources/pmarticle/1306189/Persistence-of-DNA-from-laundered-semen-stains-Implications-for-child-sex-trafficking.html
« Last Edit: November 08, 2018, 09:48:54 PM by Stephanie »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

jixy

  • Guest
Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #650 on: November 09, 2018, 07:11:19 AM »
And how does that explain All the dna found and that is was clearly visible!
« Last Edit: November 09, 2018, 07:20:06 AM by jixy »

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #651 on: November 09, 2018, 08:51:29 AM »
Repeatedly washed semen stains: Optimal screening and sampling strategies for DNA analysis.
"In many sexual assault cases, bedding and clothing are essential pieces of evidence that are screened for semen stains to gather DNA from the assailant. In some cases, these items have been washed before being seized and sent to the forensic lab. However, few data exist on the optimal methods for detecting and sampling semen stains on washed fabrics. In this paper, we used semen stains washed up to six times to evaluate the efficiency of commonly used screening methods for the detection of semen: alternate light source (ALS), acid phosphatase (AP), prostate specific antigen (PSA) and microscopy (sperm Hy-Liter, SHL). We also assessed different washing conditions (detergents, washing machines, addition of bleach) and sampling methods (cutting and swabbing). The results show that some semen stain detection strategies, such as ALS, PSA, and SHL, are effective even when the item was washed multiple times. We also show that a complete genetic profile could be obtained from semen stains washed six times. Based on these findings, we present different strategies for the detection and sampling of semen stains depending on the circumstances of the case.
https://www.bioportfolio.com/resources/pmarticle/2182455/Repeatedly-washed-semen-stains-Optimal-screening-and-sampling-strategies-for-DNA-analysis.html
« Last Edit: November 09, 2018, 08:54:39 AM by Stephanie »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

jixy

  • Guest
Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #652 on: November 09, 2018, 09:05:20 AM »
All very well but the stain(s) would not be there and visible after washing no matter what the link says!

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2169
  • Total likes: 796
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #653 on: November 09, 2018, 09:34:28 AM »
All very well but the stain(s) would not be there and visible after washing no matter what the link says!

I have to say I am surprised, but it does look like a reputable link.

jixy

  • Guest
Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #654 on: November 09, 2018, 09:45:44 AM »
I have to say I am surprised, but it does look like a reputable link.

That may be so mrswah but you have to remember that in 2003 the science was simply not available. This is from many years later..things move on

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2169
  • Total likes: 796
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #655 on: November 09, 2018, 09:57:03 AM »
That may be so mrswah but you have to remember that in 2003 the science was simply not available. This is from many years later..things move on

Ah, I see !  Fair enough.

jixy

  • Guest
Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #656 on: November 09, 2018, 10:08:18 AM »
sorry now ive read that again, it sounded like i was being rude to you. Just how the words came out.

Offline justsaying

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #657 on: November 09, 2018, 10:34:14 AM »
Sperm heads can survive a wash cycle and DNA can be extracted so innocent transfer can occur. Sandra Lean has explained this in her book so she is not trying to hide these facts.

Testing for innocent transfer in this way was not available back in 2003 so without this being tested it is just a theory, although plausible. However it was not just the sister's boyfriends sperm which was found on the t-shirt, there was multiple sperm found which was not attributed to anyone – not sure how this can be explained away. Not forgetting there was no DNA belonging to Luke.

Also what is clearly explained through evidence is that there were multiple black t-shirts available for Jodi to wear. Why would she wear one with visible staining on it, when other, identical t-shirts were available?

Now that Luke's case is being re-investigated perhaps all this will be explained once and for all, but without the testing having been done at this stage whatever is said is just theory.

This still does not give an explanation for the 2 people who were present at the crime scene at the exact time the murder was supposed to be taking place.

jixy

  • Guest
Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #658 on: November 09, 2018, 10:37:02 AM »
Thanks for the clear explanation justsaying,  makes it so much easier to comprehend

Offline Nicholas

Re: Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views
« Reply #659 on: November 09, 2018, 11:22:15 AM »
sorry now ive read that again, it sounded like i was being rude to you. Just how the words came out.

What size were the semen stains?
« Last Edit: November 09, 2018, 11:31:34 AM by Stephanie »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation