I don't need one . What I have posted is indisputable logic.
The tecnhology does not prove the dog is wrong.
Confessions also help when you have numpties involved. Gerry later repeated the same thing to Sandra Felgueiras, "The dogs were too unreliable."
16 September 2007
"They want to highlight the judge's dismissal of cadaver dog evidence in the high-profile Eugene Zapata murder trial in Madison, Wisconsin.
The couple's lawyers have already contacted Zapata's defence team, who are now sending their large file on the matter to Britain.
Zapata's estranged wife, flight instructor Jeanette Zapata, was 37 when she vanished on October 11 1976 after seeing her three children off to school. Her body has never been found.
Detectives suspected Zapata of involvement in her disappearance but did not charge him because of a lack of evidence.
Police decided to conduct new searches using cadaver dogs, a new investigative technique, when an old friend of Mrs Zapata contacted them about the case in 2004.
Zapata, 68, was charged with first-degree murder last year after the dogs indicated they sniffed human remains in a small basement "crawl space" at the former family home in Madison and other properties linked to him.
But Dane County
Judge Patrick Fiedler ruled last month that the evidence that led to the charge could not be put before the jury.
He
said the dogs were too unreliable in detecting the odour of remains and noted that no remains were actually found."