Author Topic: Strange Witness Statements  (Read 591896 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2280 on: August 06, 2016, 01:28:23 PM »
Could you tell me openly who you are referring to when you say SY have already ruled this witness out
This was explained by the head of Op Grange in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ8jmdWlB8Y

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2281 on: August 06, 2016, 01:51:10 PM »
This was explained by the head of Op Grange in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ8jmdWlB8Y
Smithman
Crecheman
Smithman
Which one?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2282 on: August 06, 2016, 02:07:46 PM »
Smithman
Crecheman
Smithman
Which one?
http://youtu.be/OZ8jmdWlB8Y?t=22m53s "we are almost certain now..."

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2283 on: August 06, 2016, 03:23:28 PM »
http://youtu.be/OZ8jmdWlB8Y?t=22m53s "we are almost certain now..."
Smithman is not the abductor - I'd worked that out.  To me it was a person carrying an unconscious child remember.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2284 on: August 06, 2016, 06:17:55 PM »
Smithman is not the abductor - I'd worked that out.  To me it was a person carrying an unconscious child remember.
IMO the Smith sighting is irrelevant Robbity. It's absurd for the investigators to make the bizarre assumption, that the solution must involve a perp openly carrying a visible child through populated streets.


Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2285 on: August 06, 2016, 07:38:29 PM »
IMO the Smith sighting is irrelevant Robbity. It's absurd for the investigators to make the bizarre assumption, that the solution must involve a perp openly carrying a visible child through populated streets.

When you understand the circumstances then the rest is simple. Smithman had to use his feet and there's nothing suspicious about carrying a sleeping child late a night in Luz.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline sadie

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2286 on: August 06, 2016, 08:12:48 PM »
IMO the Smith sighting is irrelevant Robbity. It's absurd for the investigators to make the bizarre assumption, that the solution must involve a perp openly carrying a visible child through populated streets.

OK, so what about if the "get away" vehicle was unable to pick up, frightened off because Gerry and Jez were so close and Jane Tanner had witnessed Madeleine being abducted ?    Have you disallowed that?

I think that the getaway vehicle was parked on the little parking area immediately opposite the Tapas reception .... and the driver would have had to pass Gerry, Jez and Jane to reach the abductor Tannerman.   Seeing them he took fright and drove off south down the road Rua Dr F.G.Martins, abandoning Tannerman with Madeleine.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2287 on: August 06, 2016, 09:40:11 PM »
OK, so what about if the "get away" vehicle was unable to pick up, frightened off because Gerry and Jez were so close and Jane Tanner had witnessed Madeleine being abducted ?    Have you disallowed that?

I think that the getaway vehicle was parked on the little parking area immediately opposite the Tapas reception .... and the driver would have had to pass Gerry, Jez and Jane to reach the abductor Tannerman.   Seeing them he took fright and drove off south down the road Rua Dr F.G.Martins, abandoning Tannerman with Madeleine.
IMO no-one transported anyone or anything relevant that night by foot or vehicle.

Offline sadie

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2288 on: August 06, 2016, 09:46:51 PM »
IMO no-one transported anyone or anything relevant that night by foot or vehicle.

IYO..

OK, fair enough, stalemate. 8((()*/

You have a theory and I have a totally different theory .... and my guess is that unless you produce some pretty substantial stuff, that is the way it will remain.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2289 on: August 06, 2016, 10:10:24 PM »
IYO..

OK, fair enough, stalemate. 8((()*/

You have a theory and I have a totally different theory .... and my guess is that unless you produce some pretty substantial stuff, that is the way it will remain.
I have absolutely no theory about any mode of transportation that night Sadie.
« Last Edit: August 06, 2016, 10:15:23 PM by pegasus »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2290 on: August 06, 2016, 10:15:24 PM »
IMO the Smith sighting is irrelevant Robbity. It's absurd for the investigators to make the bizarre assumption, that the solution must involve a perp openly carrying a visible child through populated streets.
No perps, just good caring people IMO.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2291 on: August 31, 2017, 01:40:18 AM »
She could hold vital timeline information. Did she witness the alarm being raised? How long after the alarm did she leave? Did she know the time? It could take her about 5 minutes to walk that distance. The mother arrived at the night creche at 10:05 from JW statement informing them about the disappearance.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JACQUELINE_WILLIAMS.htm 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2292 on: September 18, 2017, 03:23:59 PM »
Statement of Najoua Chekaya

09.30 she walked to Lagos from where she returned at about 11.30 and at about 11.45 went for lunch at the Tapas restaurant.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/NAJOUA_CHEKAYA.htm

According to Google Maps it takes between 2 and 2.5 hours to walk from Luz to Lagos.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline misty

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2293 on: September 18, 2017, 04:27:52 PM »
Statement of Najoua Chekaya

09.30 she walked to Lagos from where she returned at about 11.30 and at about 11.45 went for lunch at the Tapas restaurant.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/NAJOUA_CHEKAYA.htm

According to Google Maps it takes between 2 and 2.5 hours to walk from Luz to Lagos.

"caminhada" also means "outing" according to Google Translate.
https://translate.google.co.uk/#pt/en/caminhada

Offline G-Unit

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #2294 on: September 18, 2017, 08:08:16 PM »
"caminhada" also means "outing" according to Google Translate.
https://translate.google.co.uk/#pt/en/caminhada

efectua um a caminhada até Lagos = take a walk to Lagos
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0