if i believed as many sceptics seem to that..
That the dogs proved that Maddie body had been in 5a
That the dna proved maddie died in the apartmnet and was carried in the car...but perhaps the FFs doctored it
That the McCanns lied in their statements
That the McCcanns behaviour was odd and that statemnet analysis proves they were lying
That the McCanns started the fund to make themselves rich
That gerry discussed the abuse of his daughter in front of the Gaspars
If those things were true I too would believe the mcCanns guilty and amaral right....but I dont believe any of them
CB evidence. a phone ping in area he lived in - dodgy ex con friend who he told he knew what happened to Maddie.[this makes him prime suspectin abducting Maddie even though not proof of abduction]
Nothing with the mccs is straight forward every thing seems too have a twist.
DNA FIRST 100% match then it wasnt.
Two OF THE Best trained sniffer dogs in UK - both got it wrong. If Maddie had been found within a few days M G career would have been it tatters.
Car boot left open of car
Contradictions between the account of Jeremy Wilkins and the accounts of gmcc and Jane Tanner.IIRC JWdid not appear in documentry.
Metodo three it seems was only employed to dish dirt on GA. they also turned oit sleazy P.I
why did the mccs spend fund money on hiring these detectives?
I believe it has only seemed more about gagging GA than looking for Maddie.
Detectives Hired by the McCanns want to Frame Gonçalo Amaral
https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/02/detectives-hired-by-mccanns-want-to.html
