Whoever pulled the trigger didn't kill her outright. How can you use that as evidence way or the other?
Sheila - " yet couldn’t shoot herself properly!"
Jeremy - "yet couldn’t shoot her properly!"
Third party - "yet couldn’t shoot her properly!"
I think it is easy not to shoot yourself properly. Not everyone really wants to die.
There was NO third party. So just put that out your head.
You’re right, most people don’t want to die unless they’re suicide bombers or have some kind of huge depression.
Had Sheila shot herself in the throat, considering she immediately began haemorrhaging furiously, so much so her neck ballooned up and she must have been in severe pain where the bullet had torn the through her throat, crushed her vertebrae, and blood was gurgling up almost drowning her — she must have thought she was about to die any moment (which she would have done eventually.
Which begs the question: why would she shoot herself a second time thinking she was about to die any second, and how did she get the strength to lift the rifle again, aim it a second time, and pull the trigger when she was partially paralysed?
And how could she have done that using just one arm????
Her left arm was tucked up bent around her head and armpit. That arm would have been resting down by her body, as would her right arm too. After being shot her body would have involuntarily shook and her muscles would have twitched uncontrollably to the floor, and the gun would have flown away from her onto the floor.
It’s astonishing how stupid the police were when finding her so obviously staged.