Author Topic: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?  (Read 92300 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pegasus

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #30 on: March 13, 2016, 01:06:50 AM »
How did Kate and S's clothes get contaminated?
At the exact location within the flat those items were that night?.
« Last Edit: March 13, 2016, 11:40:24 PM by Admin »

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #31 on: March 13, 2016, 10:26:49 AM »
At the exact location within the flat those items were that night?.
there are photos of kate and sean wearing the clothing items when the mccanns were living in 4g. there wasn't an alert in 4g.

so those clothes got contaminated during the stay at 27 rua das flores, in this scenario.  if one believes the dogs.
What's up, old man?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #32 on: March 13, 2016, 10:33:20 AM »
 8(0(*
« Last Edit: March 14, 2016, 12:38:53 PM by Alfred R Jones »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #33 on: March 13, 2016, 10:47:47 AM »
there are photos of kate and sean wearing the clothing items when the mccanns were living in 4g. there wasn't an alert in 4g.

so those clothes got contaminated during the stay at 27 rua das flores, in this scenario.  if one believes the dogs.

surely if one believes the hype re the dogs then 4g would have been contaminated by those clothes...I don't believe the hype

Offline mercury

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #34 on: March 13, 2016, 10:51:32 AM »
there are photos of kate and sean wearing the clothing items when the mccanns were living in 4g. there wasn't an alert in 4g.

so those clothes got contaminated during the stay at 27 rua das flores, in this scenario.  if one believes the dogs.

Yes, the science of contamination is paradoxically quite mysterious, ergo a useless thread

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #35 on: March 13, 2016, 11:30:19 AM »
it is quite obvious that if Gerry had carried a cadaver his clothes would have reeked of cadaver scent even after washing. the dogs did not alert to them...when are these doubters going to wake up

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #36 on: March 13, 2016, 05:50:44 PM »
Yes but if your theory was correct Pathfinder that rog would say "to'ing and fro'ing, in wearing blue jeans, out wearing white trousers, in wearing white trousers, out wearing blue jeans"
The rog doesn't say that, which suggests that that your triple costume switch theory is ... ?

 8)-))) Don't think so. He wasn't wearing a jacket when SB saw him. That connects beautifully to my theory. I even surprise myself sometimes at the perfection @)(++(*
« Last Edit: March 13, 2016, 05:54:54 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #37 on: March 13, 2016, 10:11:18 PM »
Oh, and the dogs didn't alert to Gerry's clothes because there was no scent in their trained scent range for them to alert to.

Neither did Eddie alert to Kate's clothes.

He just barked and picked up certain items of her clothing in his mouth.

An untrained (and deleterious) response from any police (or private handler-dog) attending a crime scene ...

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #38 on: March 13, 2016, 11:10:05 PM »
Picking stuff up is not a trained reaction ....
« Last Edit: March 13, 2016, 11:53:20 PM by Admin »

Offline mercury

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #39 on: March 13, 2016, 11:25:44 PM »
Picking stuff up is not a trained reaction ....

How do you know?are yu au fait with all current dog handling things? Got a cite?

Offline Admin

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #40 on: March 13, 2016, 11:58:57 PM »
As you can see I have removed all posts which contravene our rules.  This thread is not the place for theories.  If this continues I will remove the thread.

Admin
« Last Edit: March 14, 2016, 12:30:26 AM by Admin »

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #41 on: March 14, 2016, 12:15:20 AM »
How do you know?are yu au fait with all current dog handling things? Got a cite?

Quote
Use of the ST 100 is recommended when subject vehicles, property, clothing, premises

are to be forensically protected from contamination by the dog, and for covert

deployment. At a11 other times best practice would be for the dog to be given direct access.

(Martin Grime).

Offline misty

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #42 on: March 14, 2016, 12:17:13 AM »
We can therefore conclude the dogs didn't alert to Gerry's clothing because none of it had cadaver odour or blood on it.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #43 on: March 14, 2016, 12:18:22 AM »
We can therefore conclude the dogs didn't alert to Gerry's clothing because none of it had cadaver odour or blood on it.

And I think we can conclude that he didn't alert to any of Kate's clothing for the same reason ....

Offline pegasus

Re: Why didn't the dogs alert to any of Gerry's clothing?
« Reply #44 on: March 14, 2016, 12:23:19 AM »
There is a video of Eddie checking all the clothing from this box.
http://youtu.be/c4NMYPsFKb8?t=1h56s
« Last Edit: March 14, 2016, 12:35:10 AM by pegasus »