Author Topic: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!  (Read 250710 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Benita

  • Guest
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #870 on: November 15, 2013, 10:14:19 AM »

bump!

the pj lied ....leanor had the bruises when she arrived at the prison ....the pj want to make their mind up when telling lies ...they said she threw herself down some stairs ..then they said she was beat up in prison  ...so which one is it ?  >@@(*&)

Offline Anna

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #871 on: November 15, 2013, 10:16:15 AM »
Anna, it would tend to show that she is not in charge of events at the prison.

Incompetence tends to lead to dismissal in most jobs.

So you are saying that the Judge, who agreed that she had been beaten at the PJ office, was a liar ?
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #872 on: November 15, 2013, 10:17:44 AM »
bump!

the pj lied ....leanor had the bruises when she arrived at the prison ....the pj want to make their mind up when telling lies ...they said she threw herself down some stairs ..then they said she was beat up in prison  ...so which one is it ?  >@@(*&)

Impossible since bruises take some time to develop and aren't immediately visible.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #873 on: November 15, 2013, 10:18:55 AM »
So you are saying that the Judge, who agreed that she had been beaten at the PJ office, was a liar ?


Anna.

The judge based his judgement on the information/witness statements provided.

Now if the information is flawed...........................

Benita

  • Guest
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #874 on: November 15, 2013, 10:19:52 AM »
Impossible since bruises take some time to develop.

no they do not ...bruises can appear straight away depending on the impact ...

Offline Anna

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #875 on: November 15, 2013, 10:20:14 AM »
Impossible since bruises take some time to develop and aren't immediately visible.

Not necessarily. and wasn't she being interrogated for 2 days?
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline Anna

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #876 on: November 15, 2013, 10:29:04 AM »

Anna.

The judge based his judgement on the information/witness statements provided.

Now if the information is flawed...........................

So the evidence was flawed ? That is the question in this whole case
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Benita

  • Guest
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #877 on: November 15, 2013, 10:31:41 AM »
So the evidence was flawed ? That is the question in this whole case

 8((()*/

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #878 on: November 15, 2013, 10:33:33 AM »
no they do not ...bruises can appear straight away depending on the impact ...

Deep impact bruises can take 5 days to develop.

Am yet to see any evidence which points to Leonor or Joao being innocent.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Anna

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #879 on: November 15, 2013, 10:38:16 AM »
Deep impact bruises can take 5 days to develop.


Well, I have yet to see a bruise that takes 5 days to show itself . It not only depends on the severity of the blow, but also the thickness of the blood.
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #880 on: November 15, 2013, 10:57:48 AM »
So the evidence was flawed ? That is the question in this whole case


You do realize that applies to both sides ?

Offline John

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #881 on: November 15, 2013, 11:33:35 AM »
The actions of Leonor and her brother João following the alleged abduction are suspicious by any stretch of the imagination.  Why the delay in seeking police assistance?  The mobile phone had no credit is the biggest load of bollocks for a start.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Carana

Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #882 on: November 15, 2013, 11:59:16 AM »
The actions of Leonor and her brother João following the alleged abduction are suspicious by any stretch of the imagination.  Why the delay in seeking police assistance?  The mobile phone had no credit is the biggest load of bollocks for a start.

Why do you find that so suspicious in the context of a disappearance in a small village? There was a village fête in full swing. She was sent out at around 20:00 to go to buy a few food items.

Where did she go? It seems to have been variously described as a "pasteleria" and as Café Celia. It seems to be a small village in which there may be a basic food/immediate necessities section and a bar section in the same "shop/bar".

Where did she go and what did this outlet sell?

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #883 on: November 15, 2013, 12:43:41 PM »
Cariad

Thinking cap on.

If the torture injuries were caused by prison inmates, why would Dr Ana photograph them?  Surely she would want to hide them, rather than publicize them?

Sadie, I was simply answering you regarding why, if LC had been beaten by prisoners she would not attribute blame to them.

That's it. I'm not claiming that that is in fact what happened, I'm just offering a reason why, if that had happened she would have reacted in that why.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!
« Reply #884 on: November 15, 2013, 12:44:41 PM »
Were the tuna and milk found in the house?