BB is Leonor Cipriano. CC is her daughter. AA is Joao Cipriano
9. 2. Facts considered NOT to be proved:
1- that the arguida BB, throughout her life, failed to provide her children with basic care, mistreating them;
2- that HH, arguida BB’s son, was helped by neighbours;
3- that the arguida BB voted her daughter CC to disinterest and overloaded her with work, forcing her to carry out the domestic chores that she should perform but did not;
4- that the arguida BB abandoned CC, just like she had done with her other children;
5- that the second time when the arguida BB handed CC to her father, the minor was approximately aged 3;
6- that minor CC was a source of fighting between her mother, arguida BB, and the stepfather II, up to the point where she was threatened by them to be expelled from home;
7- that at around 8 p.m. on that 12th of September, when the two arguidos were alone, they decided to maintain sexual intercourse between them, being that BB’s minor children were no impediment for that action, because they were asleep in a room, but CC could not watch such actions;
8- that when CC ledt the house, the arguidos started to copulate with each other, on the living room sofa, and that they were still having intercourse when the minor returned home;
9- that upon seeing what her mother and uncle were doing, minor CC said that she was going to tell her stepfather that they were “doing dirty things”, and tried to leave the house;
10- that the arguidos got up from the sofa, heading towards CC, attempting to prevent her from denouncing what she had witnessed to II;
11- that CC hit the wall’s corner with the left side of her head and that said wall was the one that is located near the main door;
12- that CC tried to flee from the house, then being pulled inside by arguido AA;
13- that CC left hand prints and facial imprints on the walls, either on the outside or on the inside, near the main door;
14- that the arguidos placed the minor’s body, wrapped up in a duvet cover, in the corner of one of the bedrooms in the house, in a spot that was not visible to anyone who might eventually enter it, for later to decide what destiny it would be given;
15- that arguida BB used detergent and bleach to wash the wall and the floor where blood spots from CC were;
16- that arguido AA had a beer with II and MM, at the "Pastelaria ...", in order to further delay their return home;
17- that the arguidos thought about placing the minor’s body in a sanitary cess-pit that was located near the house, for which arguido AA went to the location, yet verified that such would not be possible because said pit’s lid was partially cemented, which he informed arguida BB about;
18- that the knife with which the arguidos cut the minor’s body had a black handle;
19- that the arguidos placed CC’s body on the living room floor, on a blanket;
20- that the arguidos knotted the opening of the bags that contained the torso and the legs;
21- that the arguidos effectively placed the three bags inside the tree compartments of the deep freezer;
22- that the arguidos changed the clothes that they were wearing and that arguida BB, once again that night, washed the blood that had remained on the floor;
23- that on the night of the 12th of September arguida BB invoked CC’s ‘disappearance’ to the persons that she met (with an exception for II, MM and NN whom she told about said ‘disappearance’);
24- that the bag which the arguidos were carrying late in the night of the 13th of September contained the instruments that had been used to cut the minor;
25- that meanwhile, ticks started to appear in the house, due to the aforementioned activity;
26- that already after her arrest, arguida BB did, several times, impute co-arguido AA with the full responsibility for the facts, also that she imputed MM with it as well, apart from having mentioned that the body was placed inside a car that was destined to be pressed in Spain, or on several locations that she indicated throughout time;
27- that arguido AA, during the first interrogation, indicated that CC’s body is beneath a bridge that connects Figueira with Mexilhoeira, on the opposite side of the location that had initially been indicated, and that, afterwards, he indicated a brother of his as having transported the body;
28- that the arguidos acted merely with the purpose to preven the minor from denunciating what she had seen, to her stepfather;
29- that the minor CC depended upon arguido AA."
source: Supreme Court of Justice - ruling SJ200604200003635, 20.04.200