Seems as if we have some accord then,not arguidos,ergo not suspects.
Unless the laws have changed yet again, it is actually possible to be a suspect without (yet) being an arguido.
I only spotted this as some articles in PT law use both terms, but don't clarify the difference.
Although I could be wrong, my assumption is that a suspect could simply be someone on the radar, possibly under covert surveillance... prior to the formal interview requiring that status.
It's also worth remembering that the term of "arguido" covers everything from the equivalent of an interview under caution through the entire judicial process (including what in English would be termed as defendant) until all recourses have been exhausted. You could be a mass murderer serving a life sentence, but still be referred to as an arguido until the end of the Supreme Court judgement.
Pedro do Carmo said that they were not suspects.
I've cited references numerous times.
ETA: Just seen Brietta's warning re being OT.
Re Netflix... I don't see what could be new...