Author Topic: Maddie Basta de Mentiras  (Read 13211 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #90 on: October 10, 2021, 05:09:53 PM »
My interest is seeing justice being done and the perp found guilty and punished.. And being proved I have been right all along.. And all the sceptics.. Pat Brown.. MS.. Sh.. and all the others regarded as some as experts... Wrong

Don't give up your day job.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #91 on: October 10, 2021, 05:22:16 PM »
Does anyone know what this moron is on about?

Maddie MacCann would have expression problems. The conclusion must have been the British police, says Gonçalo Amaral, who was responsible for conducting investigations into the disappearance of the English girl, in May 2007, in Praia da Luz, Algarve.

To a daily newspaper, the former inspector of the Judiciary Police (PJ) assures that the British authorities realized that Maddie, who at the time was four years old, experienced these difficulties after questioning her mother, Kate McCann. "The British police had a database for children in this age group, which had to do with how they referred to a certain object. They asked the mother questions and she mentioned, for example, how the girl said 'chair' , 'pee', and they concluded, from the phrases her mother used to say, that there was some problem with Maddie there," explained Gonçalo Amaral to Correio da Manhã.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline kizzy

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #92 on: October 10, 2021, 06:43:26 PM »
Does anyone know what this moron is on about?

Maddie MacCann would have expression problems. The conclusion must have been the British police, says Gonçalo Amaral, who was responsible for conducting investigations into the disappearance of the English girl, in May 2007, in Praia da Luz, Algarve.

To a daily newspaper, the former inspector of the Judiciary Police (PJ) assures that the British authorities realized that Maddie, who at the time was four years old, experienced these difficulties after questioning her mother, Kate McCann. "The British police had a database for children in this age group, which had to do with how they referred to a certain object. They asked the mother questions and she mentioned, for example, how the girl said 'chair' , 'pee', and they concluded, from the phrases her mother used to say, that there was some problem with Maddie there," explained Gonçalo Amaral to Correio da Manhã.

Well, if it isn't true...the mcs can always sue him again.

Have you a cite for your post

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #93 on: October 10, 2021, 06:52:02 PM »
Well, if it isn't true...the mcs can always sue him again.

Have you a cite for your post

It's not libellous... Uninformed stupidity.. Yes.. But not libel.
It's quite clear he hasn't got a clue... That's not libellous either.. Honest opinion based on evidence

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #94 on: October 10, 2021, 06:59:25 PM »
Well, if it isn't true...the mcs can always sue him again.

Have you a cite for your post
It’s from one of the moron’s recent interviews in a Portuguese paper plugging his book.  CdM. 
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #95 on: October 10, 2021, 07:03:08 PM »
When I was a kid I called windscreen wipers “windscreepers” and elephants “beeboos”, must I infer from this that I was sexually abused by a friend of my parents?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Anthro

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #96 on: October 10, 2021, 07:27:39 PM »
Does anyone know what this moron is on about?

Maddie MacCann would have expression problems. The conclusion must have been the British police, says Gonçalo Amaral, who was responsible for conducting investigations into the disappearance of the English girl, in May 2007, in Praia da Luz, Algarve.

To a daily newspaper, the former inspector of the Judiciary Police (PJ) assures that the British authorities realized that Maddie, who at the time was four years old, experienced these difficulties after questioning her mother, Kate McCann. "The British police had a database for children in this age group, which had to do with how they referred to a certain object. They asked the mother questions and she mentioned, for example, how the girl said 'chair' , 'pee', and they concluded, from the phrases her mother used to say, that there was some problem with Maddie there," explained Gonçalo Amaral to Correio da Manhã.
The mind boggles … a three-year-old expressing the words ‘pee’ and ‘chair’ suggest ‘a problem’ (?)

Offline jassi

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #97 on: October 10, 2021, 07:34:08 PM »
I'm sure that if there is a police database dealing with these sort of terms, then someone will know about it and be able to inform us.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline kizzy

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #98 on: October 10, 2021, 07:37:17 PM »
It's not libellous... Uninformed stupidity.. Yes.. But not libel.
It's quite clear he hasn't got a clue... That's not libellous either.. Honest opinion based on evidence

What about this then.

The photo that led Portuguese investigators to interrogate Kate McCann about the bruise on the girl's right wrist was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance. Former inspector Gonçalo Amaral claims that the mark is not compatible with the explanation given by Maddie's parents.

Maddie appears in a photo with a suspicious mark. The PJ investigation maintains that the photograph was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance of the English girl on May 3, 2007, in Praia da Luz, Algarve. Former PJ inspector Gonçalo Amaral, who headed the team in charge of investigating the disappearance, points out that the photo reveals “that the girl has a mark on her right wrist”.

The photograph, which is part of the interim report carried out by the PJ in September 2007, shows, for Gonçalo Amaral, a mark “as if someone had grabbed it and pulled it with excessive force”. At the time, Kate McCann, Maddie's mother, downplayed the mark to the authorities, affirming that it was a sunburn. For investigators, the sunburn excuse does not hold water. The girl then wore short sleeves, meaning that, if it was a sunburn, it would not be so localized and “well drawn”, says Gonçalo Amaral.

The photo also raised doubts, given the possibility of being a photomontage. The former inspector explains that “the body in the photo is that of a child older than Maddie”, then three years old. Gonçalo Amaral argues that Portugal should continue to investigate the case and that this photo should be properly examined, so the mother can be questioned later.

Another photo that raises doubts about its authenticity is one where Gerry McCann is shown sitting at the edge of the pool with his two daughters. “We can see some shadows in there. The direction of shadows and sun is not correct. At the time, we doubted the photo, we thought it was a way to create the image of a good father”, said the former inspector of the PJ. For Gonçalo Amaral, there are doubts about the evidence that the German judicial authorities gathered to accuse, by the end of the year, Christian Brueckner of the abduction and death of Maddie.

Camera and blanket disappeared
There are two objects from the McCanns that were photographed by the scientific police on the night of the disappearance and then went missing: the camera that was on the table and the pink blanket on Maddie's bed. Gonçalo Amaral reveals that the mother said she gave the blanket to the GNR, which didn't happen.

Behind paywall - Correio da Manhã, 10 October 2021
https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/maddie-tinha-marca-suspeita-num-pulso?ref=HP_PrimeirosDestaques

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #99 on: October 10, 2021, 07:52:31 PM »
What about this then.

The photo that led Portuguese investigators to interrogate Kate McCann about the bruise on the girl's right wrist was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance. Former inspector Gonçalo Amaral claims that the mark is not compatible with the explanation given by Maddie's parents.

Maddie appears in a photo with a suspicious mark. The PJ investigation maintains that the photograph was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance of the English girl on May 3, 2007, in Praia da Luz, Algarve. Former PJ inspector Gonçalo Amaral, who headed the team in charge of investigating the disappearance, points out that the photo reveals “that the girl has a mark on her right wrist”.

The photograph, which is part of the interim report carried out by the PJ in September 2007, shows, for Gonçalo Amaral, a mark “as if someone had grabbed it and pulled it with excessive force”. At the time, Kate McCann, Maddie's mother, downplayed the mark to the authorities, affirming that it was a sunburn. For investigators, the sunburn excuse does not hold water. The girl then wore short sleeves, meaning that, if it was a sunburn, it would not be so localized and “well drawn”, says Gonçalo Amaral.

The photo also raised doubts, given the possibility of being a photomontage. The former inspector explains that “the body in the photo is that of a child older than Maddie”, then three years old. Gonçalo Amaral argues that Portugal should continue to investigate the case and that this photo should be properly examined, so the mother can be questioned later.

Another photo that raises doubts about its authenticity is one where Gerry McCann is shown sitting at the edge of the pool with his two daughters. “We can see some shadows in there. The direction of shadows and sun is not correct. At the time, we doubted the photo, we thought it was a way to create the image of a good father”, said the former inspector of the PJ. For Gonçalo Amaral, there are doubts about the evidence that the German judicial authorities gathered to accuse, by the end of the year, Christian Brueckner of the abduction and death of Maddie.

Camera and blanket disappeared
There are two objects from the McCanns that were photographed by the scientific police on the night of the disappearance and then went missing: the camera that was on the table and the pink blanket on Maddie's bed. Gonçalo Amaral reveals that the mother said she gave the blanket to the GNR, which didn't happen.

Behind paywall - Correio da Manhã, 10 October 2021
https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/maddie-tinha-marca-suspeita-num-pulso?ref=HP_PrimeirosDestaques


none of that is libellous...it says teh PJ were suspicious of the mark and felt the expalnation given didnt fit...

Show me where in the new book he says its confirmed Maddie died in the apartmnet and the parents covered it up. In this book he is merely putting forward hypotheses. He says the only knowm fact is that MM disappeared

Offline faithlilly

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #100 on: October 10, 2021, 07:53:41 PM »
What about this then.

The photo that led Portuguese investigators to interrogate Kate McCann about the bruise on the girl's right wrist was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance. Former inspector Gonçalo Amaral claims that the mark is not compatible with the explanation given by Maddie's parents.

Maddie appears in a photo with a suspicious mark. The PJ investigation maintains that the photograph was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance of the English girl on May 3, 2007, in Praia da Luz, Algarve. Former PJ inspector Gonçalo Amaral, who headed the team in charge of investigating the disappearance, points out that the photo reveals “that the girl has a mark on her right wrist”.

The photograph, which is part of the interim report carried out by the PJ in September 2007, shows, for Gonçalo Amaral, a mark “as if someone had grabbed it and pulled it with excessive force”. At the time, Kate McCann, Maddie's mother, downplayed the mark to the authorities, affirming that it was a sunburn. For investigators, the sunburn excuse does not hold water. The girl then wore short sleeves, meaning that, if it was a sunburn, it would not be so localized and “well drawn”, says Gonçalo Amaral.

The photo also raised doubts, given the possibility of being a photomontage. The former inspector explains that “the body in the photo is that of a child older than Maddie”, then three years old. Gonçalo Amaral argues that Portugal should continue to investigate the case and that this photo should be properly examined, so the mother can be questioned later.

Another photo that raises doubts about its authenticity is one where Gerry McCann is shown sitting at the edge of the pool with his two daughters. “We can see some shadows in there. The direction of shadows and sun is not correct. At the time, we doubted the photo, we thought it was a way to create the image of a good father”, said the former inspector of the PJ. For Gonçalo Amaral, there are doubts about the evidence that the German judicial authorities gathered to accuse, by the end of the year, Christian Brueckner of the abduction and death of Maddie.

Camera and blanket disappeared
There are two objects from the McCanns that were photographed by the scientific police on the night of the disappearance and then went missing: the camera that was on the table and the pink blanket on Maddie's bed. Gonçalo Amaral reveals that the mother said she gave the blanket to the GNR, which didn't happen.

Behind paywall - Correio da Manhã, 10 October 2021
https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/maddie-tinha-marca-suspeita-num-pulso?ref=HP_PrimeirosDestaques


It doesn’t sound as if he’s been cowed into silence by previous litigation.

He appears to be suggesting that Madeleine was the victim of physical abuse by one or both of her parents. I wonder how the parents will react?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #101 on: October 10, 2021, 07:57:27 PM »
It doesn’t sound as if he’s been cowed into silence by previous litigation.

He appears to be suggesting that Madeleine was the victim of physical abuse by one or both of her parents. I wonder how the parents will react?

he is saying she could have been the victim of physical abuse....he has evidence to support taht which he has  stated.  Looks like hes had some instruction on what is and isnt libel....this isnt

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #102 on: October 10, 2021, 08:04:49 PM »
What about this then.

The photo that led Portuguese investigators to interrogate Kate McCann about the bruise on the girl's right wrist was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance. Former inspector Gonçalo Amaral claims that the mark is not compatible with the explanation given by Maddie's parents.

Maddie appears in a photo with a suspicious mark. The PJ investigation maintains that the photograph was taken days, or hours, before the disappearance of the English girl on May 3, 2007, in Praia da Luz, Algarve. Former PJ inspector Gonçalo Amaral, who headed the team in charge of investigating the disappearance, points out that the photo reveals “that the girl has a mark on her right wrist”.

The photograph, which is part of the interim report carried out by the PJ in September 2007, shows, for Gonçalo Amaral, a mark “as if someone had grabbed it and pulled it with excessive force”. At the time, Kate McCann, Maddie's mother, downplayed the mark to the authorities, affirming that it was a sunburn. For investigators, the sunburn excuse does not hold water. The girl then wore short sleeves, meaning that, if it was a sunburn, it would not be so localized and “well drawn”, says Gonçalo Amaral.

The photo also raised doubts, given the possibility of being a photomontage. The former inspector explains that “the body in the photo is that of a child older than Maddie”, then three years old. Gonçalo Amaral argues that Portugal should continue to investigate the case and that this photo should be properly examined, so the mother can be questioned later.

Another photo that raises doubts about its authenticity is one where Gerry McCann is shown sitting at the edge of the pool with his two daughters. “We can see some shadows in there. The direction of shadows and sun is not correct. At the time, we doubted the photo, we thought it was a way to create the image of a good father”, said the former inspector of the PJ. For Gonçalo Amaral, there are doubts about the evidence that the German judicial authorities gathered to accuse, by the end of the year, Christian Brueckner of the abduction and death of Maddie.

Camera and blanket disappeared
There are two objects from the McCanns that were photographed by the scientific police on the night of the disappearance and then went missing: the camera that was on the table and the pink blanket on Maddie's bed. Gonçalo Amaral reveals that the mother said she gave the blanket to the GNR, which didn't happen.

Behind paywall - Correio da Manhã, 10 October 2021
https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/maddie-tinha-marca-suspeita-num-pulso?ref=HP_PrimeirosDestaques

So is the photo a photomontage featuring another child’s body or does it show a “battered and bruised” Madeleine?  You can’t have it both ways Genius!
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #103 on: October 10, 2021, 08:07:18 PM »
It seems to me tha Amaral has taken his last chance to make some money out of Maddies disappearance. He can make alll these claims until evidence is produced to show the McCanns are innocent and maddie was abducted by a paedophile....evidence its clear to me Wolyers has. Once that is shown to be true his reputation will be in tatters

Offline faithlilly

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #104 on: October 10, 2021, 08:14:04 PM »
he is saying she could have been the victim of physical abuse....he has evidence to support taht which he has  stated.  Looks like hes had some instruction on what is and isnt libel....this isnt

And this?

“ At the time, Kate McCann, Maddie's mother, downplayed the mark to the authorities, affirming that it was a sunburn. For investigators, the sunburn excuse does not hold water. “
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?