UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Welcome to the UK Justice Forum => Admin introduction, forum rules, colours and requests for documents and photos. => Topic started by: John on March 29, 2015, 08:01:31 PM
-
An issue has arisen in relation to members signatures which if created appear at the bottom of each post they make. This is not the first time that we have been asked to remove or alter a signature so we require a policy which is acceptable to everyone. This is your opportunity to have your say.
The signature function has been temporarily suspended. As it stood it allowed for up to 300 characters over two lines. Smileys could be added if desired.
It has been suggested that any signature which another member deems to be distasteful or objectionable should not be allowed.
Over to you, please make your views known.
-
I don't think anything should be allowed which could be seen as goading or insincere. Anything seen as controversial should also not be allowed.
-
Not a frequent occurrence, but I agree with Angelo.
-
It has been suggested that any signature which another member deems to be distasteful or objectionable should not be allowed.
Over to you, please make your views known.
I think that suggestion is too broadly worded. Personally I would be content to leave any moderation of signatures to the good sense of yourself and others on the Admin team.
-
Signatures that are offensive or likely to provoke a negative response from other members, I don’t think should be allowed.
However the offended party should explain why it is offensive to him/her, if it is not already obvious.
-
Discard it altogether. Doesn't this forum stand for justice, not propaganda?
-
Wouild you mind giving me my signature back please.
I gave no-one any permission to interfere with it and I would like it re-instated.
Thank you
sadie
-
Wouild you mind giving me my signature back please.
I gave no-one any permission to interfere with it and I would like it re-instated.
Thank you
sadie
It is just temporary measure, Sadie, until things are sorted out. They have all been suspended.
BTW It's nice to see you back here again.
-
It is just temporary measure, Sadie, until things are sorted out. They have all been suspended.
BTW It's nice to see you back here again.
Nice to see you Anna. I shall not be around much. My job is mainly done.... and I am very tired
The Elite Organisations, Injustice and Old School Tie have won ..
Untouchables.
As I thought quite likely all along.
Take care. xxx
-
Signatures that are offensive or likely to provoke a negative response from other members, I don’t think should be allowed.
However the offended party should explain why it is offensive to him/her, if it is not already obvious.
I agree Anna however I do take exception to offensive remarks masquerading as biblical quotes. It doesn't take a genius to work out the real thrust of such comments without anyone explaining it.
-
I agree Anna however I do take exception to offensive remarks masquerading as biblical quotes. It doesn't take a genius to work out the real thrust of such comments without anyone explaining it.
you really do have a bee in your bonnet about that don't you? What a sensitive little flower you turned out to be after all.
-
you really do have a bee in your bonnet about that don't you? What a sensitive little flower you turned out to be after all.
Lest we forget it was you who instigated all this hand wringing about signatures by insisting that my siggie was removed though why a grown man would carp on for pages and pages about a quote he could have ignored I simply have no idea.
BTW having more important things to worry about I don't give a tinker's cuss what posters have as a signature. If I don't like it I'll simply ignore it ?{)(**
-
Oddly enough, since I joined I have found signatures the fastest way to learn of people's opinions and/or character. After that, I need to plough through long threads. I get to much the same conclusion but it takes me a lot longer.
Allow signatures. Weed out anything that is illegal (obvious). Weed out anything that is uncivil (it's a forum and we should be civil to each other, whether we agree with each other or not). Otherwise it degenerates to PM's question time, which is one of the most childish farces on the planet.
-
Hello, as I remember, my sig was a comment in Turkish. If someone in admin or a mod would like to pm it to me (forgotten exactly what it said) I am happy to translate it. It was not an insult, derogatory or rude. Puffin *&(+(+
-
Lest we forget it was you who instigated all this hand wringing about signatures by insisting that my siggie was removed though why a grown man would carp on for pages and pages about a quote he could have ignored I simply have no idea.
BTW having more important things to worry about I don't give a tinker's cuss what posters have as a signature. If I don't like it I'll simply ignore it ?{)(**
Yes why would a grown man bother about pursuing the truth of the matter, crazy isn't it? Especially when the allegation is so serious, hardly worth bothering about is it?
-
A signature can be an excellent way to let others know a little about you and of your interests. It is a facility provided by the forum and should not be abused. Propaganda, speculations and any text which others might find objectionable will not be allowed.
If there are no further comments I propose to reinstate the function later today.
-
you really do have a bee in your bonnet about that don't you? What a sensitive little flower you turned out to be after all.
Or just possibly my religious beliefs influence my opinion on it rather than being sensitive.
-
Or just possibly my religious beliefs influence my opinion on it rather than being sensitive.
Are you saying that your religious sensibilities were offended by my quote from the King James Bible? Are you a Muslim?
-
Are you saying that your religious sensibilities were offended by my quote from the King James Bible? Are you a Muslim?
The manner in which it was done offended my religious sensibilities.
No.
-
The manner in which it was done offended my religious sensibilities.
No.
It was a straight forward quote with no embellishments. I see no reason at all why direct quotations from the Bible cannot be used in signature lines, or how they could offend anyone's religious sensibilities unless they were anti-Christian.
-
It was a straight forward quote with no embellishments. I see no reason at all why direct quotations from the Bible cannot be used in signature lines, or how they could offend anyone's religious sensibilities unless they were anti-Christian.
OK Alf
Roger and out.
-
I have added my signature, I hope it doesn't offend.
-
Members are again reminded that personal signatures must be appropriate. Restating the 'f..king tosser' quote from Kate McCann's book should not be used at this time.
Admin
-
A reminder.
A signature can be an excellent way to let others know a little about you, your interests and beliefs. It is a facility provided by the forum and should not be abused.
Propaganda, speculations and any text which others might find objectionable will not be allowed.
Comments please.
Admin
-
A reminder.
A signature can be an excellent way to let others know a little about you, your interests and beliefs. It is a facility provided by the forum and should not be abused.
Propaganda, speculations and any text which others might find objectionable will not be allowed.
Comments please.
Admin
At least two members have references to Summers and Swans book which I feel is advertising and breaches the rules.
-
At least two members have references to Summers and Swans book which I feel is advertising and breaches the rules.
Here's the thing. I added my sig line in response to Faithlilly's signature which strives to give the reader the impression that Summers & Swann believe there are legitimate grounds for doubting the parents. My sig line makes it clear what their true opinion is. I will happily remove my signature once Faithlilly has removed hers.
-
Here's the thing. I added my sig line in response to Faithlilly's signature which strives to give the reader the impression that Summers & Swann believe there are legitimate grounds for doubting the parents. My sig line makes it clear what their true opinion is. I will happily remove my signature once Faithlilly has removed hers.
well it always looks to me Alf..... as if you are refering to summers and swan with the out out you demons of stupidity... the way the caption is looking down....i thought it was S&S ...who you were calling stupid demons
-
At least two members have references to Summers and Swans book which I feel is advertising and breaches the rules.
stephen has one re S& S which is libellous and against forum rules
-
well it always looks to me Alf..... as if you are refering to summers and swan with the out out you demons of stupidity... the way the caption is looking down....i thought it was S&S ...who you were calling stupid demons
If it amuses you and Faithlilly to read it that way then that's absolutely fine by me. 8)--))
-
I have a question about a moderator's signature line which is as follows:
Helping Elite sufferers of NPD for over 2 years...
It is my contention that this is a dig at certain members of this forum, but am happyto be corrected if we could be told who these Elite sufferers of NPD are and how the mod has helped them.
-
Why not just bin the idea of signature strips ?
Then we will not have petty arguments about same with some folk trying to assert they are a special case whereas others are not.
It might remove some of the fun though!
-
I may be mistaken but a certain member seems to be using their signature strip to accuse other members of abuse and bullying. Apologies if I am misunderstanding, but that's how I'm reading it.
-
Its been deleted and rightly so as it was a wumming / trolling signature
Well done to whoever removed it
-
The signature feature is provided to members so that they can attach something appropriate relative to themself at the bottom of each post. Comments directed at or about other members are not permitted.
Inappropriate remarks are against forum rules and will be dealt with accordingly. TY