Anti facebook groups etc

[John]

The Germans are only focused on Brueckner because of some statement made to British police by a criminal associate.  There are no other declared suspects.

They are desperate to prosecute him for something, hence the  unrelated alleged forthcoming charges. I can see no other reason why they should want to act as world police force.

Clearly they are piecing together some  evidential links and hope to persuade judges of their validity.

IMO

Prosecutors get tunnel vision in these cases especially when they go public with unverified claims. Desperation appears to take over and that leads to wrongful convictions.

[Wonderfulspam]

Why?  Just taken against him for no good reason?

Because he's an obvious danger to the public.

[Eleanor]

Because he lived & worked in the area, broke into apartments & robbed, raped a granny & some young sort, molested kids, went around telling his mates he knew all about the McCann case, told a paedo in a chat room that he murdered Maddie, destroying the evidence, & the pigs don't know where he was on May 3rd.

Pigs?  What does that mean?

[Wonderfulspam]

Pigs?  What does that mean?

Police, sorry, he doesn't like the cops.

Anyway, he's a danger to the public, this will be why Wolters is going after him hard imo

They want to stop him abusing kids, dropping his trousers in playgrounds & breaking into places, robbing & raping.

They might get him for all that stuff, but it doesn't look like they'll ever get him for Maddie, maybe because he just didn't do it.  He did all the other stuff, just not Maddie imo

[Venturi Swirl]

Prosecutors get tunnel vision in these cases especially when they go public with unverified claims. Desperation appears to take over and that leads to wrongful convictions.

They can't be that desperate - it's been two years now and no charges yet.

[Mr Gray]

Prosecutors get tunnel vision in these cases especially when they go public with unverified claims. Desperation appears to take over and that leads to wrongful convictions.

I think your post is laughable..
Either wolters wants to commit professional suicide or he has evidence that shows 100% CB murdered Maddie.
If he hasn't CB can sue him and ruin him

I think you are dreaming John

[Wonderfulspam]

I think your post is laughable..
Either wolters wants to commit professional suicide or he has evidence that shows 100% CB murdered Maddie.
If he hasn't CB can sue him and ruin him

I think you are dreaming John

He has the flimsy-ass evidence Brueckner telling his mates he murdered Maddie.

So, Brueckner can't really sue him then, because he said he dunnit.

[John]

I think your post is laughable..
Either wolters wants to commit professional suicide or he has evidence that shows 100% CB murdered Maddie.
If he hasn't CB can sue him and ruin him

I think you are dreaming John

Absolutely not. Seen it happen all the time in the real world.  If you think the police and the prosecutors are beyond reproach then you must be living in a parallel universe. Some of them should be behind bars!

[Mr Gray]

Absolutely not. Seen it happen all the time in the real world.  If you think the police and the prosecutors are beyond reproach then you must be living in a parallel universe. Some of them should be behind bars!

I'm well aware of what you say but that is not always the case.  You had nothing but praise for amaral who is discredited... Saying the police will have more evidence than they have revealed. I don't see anything to suggest it applies in this case... Quite the opposite. 
Do you really think Wolters would destroy his own career knowing that if he's lying CB can sue him.
I think he's playing a very clever game... Drawing CB out.. He's already managed to confirm he doesn't have an alibi.. Well done Wolters

[John]

I'm well aware of what you say but that is not always the case.  You had nothing but praise for amaral who is discredited... Saying the police will have more evidence than they have revealed. I don't see anything to suggest it applies in this case... Quite the opposite. 
Do you really think Wolters would destroy his own career knowing that if he's lying CB can sue him.
I think he's playing a very clever game... Drawing CB out.. He's already managed to confirm he doesn't have an alibi.. Well done Wolters

I don't think Wolters has any credibility left. He has refused to reveal to the McCanns what happened to their daughter and that is unforgivable in my book.

[Venturi Swirl]

I don't think Wolters has any credibility left. He has refused to reveal to the McCanns what happened to their daughter and that is unforgivable in my book.

Why do you think he's still in a job then?  Even the Portuguese managed to see sense and ditch Amaral when it was obvious what an idiot he was after only a few short months, two years down the line why has the penny still not dropped for the Germans yet in your opinion?

[Wonderfulspam]

I'm well aware of what you say but that is not always the case.  You had nothing but praise for amaral who is discredited... Saying the police will have more evidence than they have revealed. I don't see anything to suggest it applies in this case... Quite the opposite. 
Do you really think Wolters would destroy his own career knowing that if he's lying CB can sue him.
I think he's playing a very clever game... Drawing CB out.. He's already managed to confirm he doesn't have an alibi.. Well done Wolters

So he doesn't have a solid alibi?

The girl can't remember if she was with him that night, or not, so she could have been with him, or perhaps not.

So it's Wolters move now then, now he knows Brueckner has no firm alibi.

But Wolters isn't doing much about it, is he?

So, it's pretty obvious he can't actually prove Brueckner was abducting Maddie that night, really.

[Mr Gray]

I don't think Wolters has any credibility left. He has refused to reveal to the McCanns what happened to their daughter and that is unforgivable in my book.

I'm sure the McCanns would rather find out what happened to Maddie than be told something that could ruin the investigation. It seems CB has been served evidence of an intended prosecution.. Perhaps the Behan rape case. The Portuguese failed miserably in the previous one where the Germans succeeded.  We will be able to judge him once that's heard

[Wonderfulspam]

I'm sure the McCanns would rather find out what happened to Maddie than be told something that could ruin the investigation. It seems CB has been served evidence of an intended prosecution.. Perhaps the Behan rape case. The Portuguese failed miserably in the previous one where the Germans succeeded.  We will be able to judge him once that's heard

Can't the McCanns be trusted to keep their mouths shut then?

[Wonderfulspam]

I don't think Wolters has any credibility left. He has refused to reveal to the McCanns what happened to their daughter and that is unforgivable in my book.

Maybe it's because he doesn't really have any concrete evidence to show them.